CAIQ vs TLA: which paid, and which earned it?
CAIQ and TLA both write options for income. Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF.
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
13.7% of it arrived as cash
7.3 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
7.3 pts behind QQQ
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
11.1% as cash
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
11.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CAIQ | TLA | CAIQ | TLA | CAIQ | TLA |
| 3 months | +2.6% | +3.3% | 2.9% | 3.1% | +0.5 pts | +19.9 pts |
| 6 months | +18.4% | +11.2% | 8.0% | 8.2% | −8.4 pts | +18.1 pts |
| Since launch CAIQ Nov 2025 · TLA Feb 2026 | +19.6% | +10.4% | 13.7% | 11.1% | −7.3 pts | +26.3 pts |
CAIQ and TLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CAIQ and TLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid monthly.
TLA in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, TLA paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.4%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −15.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 26.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CAIQ against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-tla
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-tla Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CAIQ against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-tla
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). CAIQ against TLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-tla
- Markdown
- [CAIQ against TLA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-tla)