Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BAGY vs BTCI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year BAGY paid 20.3% of its price in cash against BTCI’s 18.6%, though BTCI returned more with it reinvested.

Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF.

20.3%BAGY cash paid, 1 year
18.6%BTCI cash paid, 1 year
−40.2%BAGY total return, 1 year
−29.1%BTCI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BTCI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BAGY 18.3BTCI 45.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BAGY9.2 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BAGY−40.2%9.2 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BAGY−40.2%9.2 pts behind IBIT
BTCI2 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BTCI−29.1%2 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BTCI−29.1%2 pts ahead of IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BAGY and BTCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BAGYOnly in BTCI
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 45.60%United States Treasury Bill 78.13%
Cash & Other 23.34%iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 14.10%
United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 18.11%VanEck Bitcoin ETF/US 7.77%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 C 17.25%
United States Treasury Bill 09/29/2026 1.45%
MBTX 09/22/2026 188.42 C -2.58%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 P -3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BAGY and BTCI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BAGYBTCIBAGYBTCIBAGYBTCI
3 months+11.0%+22.3%7.4%7.0%−18.2 pts−6.9 pts
6 months−2.5%+11.9%14.9%12.7%−18.2 pts−3.8 pts
1 year−40.2%−29.1%20.3%18.6%−9.2 pts+2.0 pts
Since launch−23.5%+15.5%34.9%54.4%−8.4 pts−5.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BAGY and BTCI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
Option income on IBIT, paying monthly
IssuerAmplifyNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized29.9%26.3%
Expense ratio0.65%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year20.3%18.6%
Price change, 1 year−57.9%−47.0%
Total return, 1 year−40.2%−29.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%−31.1%
Ahead or behind−9.2 pts+2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published94%
Age507 days701 days
Net assets$11m$1.3bn

BAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BAGY paid 20.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 57.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −40.2%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid monthly.

BTCI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCI paid 18.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 47.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BAGY or BTCI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BAGY paid 20.3% of its starting price in cash and BTCI paid 18.6%, so BAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BAGY or BTCI?
With every distribution reinvested, BAGY returned −40.2% and BTCI returned −29.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BTCI returned more.
Which is cheaper, BAGY or BTCI?
BAGY charges 0.65% a year and BTCI charges 0.99%, so BAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAGY against BTCI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAGY against BTCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bagy-vs-btci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources