APRJ vs TLA: which paid, and which earned it?

APRJ and TLA both write options for income. Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April and GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF.

6.2%
APRJ cash paid, 1 year
11.1%
TLA cash paid, since launch
+6.1%
APRJ total return, 1 year
+10.4%
TLA total return, since launch
APRJ · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.6 pts behind SPY
APRJ
+6.1%
SPY
+15.7%

9.6 pts behind SPY

APRJ over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.2%, total +6.1%, SPY +15.7%, −9.6 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

APRJ

+6.1%

6.2% as cash

9.6 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.6 pts behind SPY

APRJ over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.2%, total +6.1%, SPY +15.7%, −9.6 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

APRJ

+6.1%

9.6 pts behind SPY

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. APRJ over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.2%, total +6.1%, SPY +15.7%, −9.6 pts.

TLA · since launch to Sep 30, 202626.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA
+10.4%
TSLA
−15.9%

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.

TSLA

−15.9%

TLA

+10.4%

11.1% of it arrived as cash

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

Total return, distributions reinvested

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.

TSLA

−15.9%

TLA

+10.4%

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

11.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAPRJTLAAPRJTLAAPRJTLA
3 months+1.1%+3.3%1.7%3.1%−1.4 pts+19.9 pts
6 months+3.9%+11.2%3.5%8.2%−13.1 pts+18.1 pts
1 year+6.1%not published6.2%not published−9.6 ptsnot published
3 years+19.5%not published17.8%not published−65.5 ptsnot published
Since launch
APRJ Apr 2023 · TLA Feb 2026
+23.8%+10.4%21.1%11.1%−70.0 pts+26.3 pts

APRJ and TLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
TLA
GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF · Autocallable on TSLA, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator GraniteShares
Strategy defined income autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Tesla (TSLA)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.9% 18.4%
Expense ratio 0.79% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.2% 11.1% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −0.2% −1.4%
Total return, 1 year +6.1% +10.4% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.7% −15.9%
Ahead or behind −9.6 pts +26.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 4%
Age 1276 days 239 days
Net assets $28m $5m

APRJ and TLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

APRJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, APRJ paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid quarterly.

TLA in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, TLA paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.4%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −15.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 26.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, APRJ or TLA?
APRJ charges 0.79% a year and TLA charges 1.07%, so APRJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, APRJ against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprj-vs-tla

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.