AMYY vs XVAD: which paid, and which earned it?
AMYY and XVAD both write options for income. GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF and FT Vest AMD & Target Income ETF.
243.2 pts behind AMD
AMYY over 1 year: paid 67.8%, price −43.9%, total +34.9%, AMD +278.1%, −243.2 pts.
AMD
+278.1%
AMYY
+34.9%
243.2 pts behind AMD
Total return, distributions reinvested
243.2 pts behind AMD
AMYY over 1 year: paid 67.8%, price −43.9%, total +34.9%, AMD +278.1%, −243.2 pts.
AMD
+278.1%
AMYY
+34.9%
243.2 pts behind AMD
67.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. AMYY over 1 year: paid 67.8%, price −43.9%, total +34.9%, AMD +278.1%, −243.2 pts.
About even with AMD
XVAD since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, AMD −0.5%, +0.4 pts.
AMD
−0.5%
XVAD
0.0%
about even with AMD
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with AMD
XVAD since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, AMD −0.5%, +0.4 pts.
AMD
−0.5%
XVAD
0.0%
about even with AMD
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +278.1%. XVAD since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, AMD −0.5%, +0.4 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AMYY and XVAD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AMYY | XVAD | AMYY | XVAD | AMYY | XVAD |
| 3 months | +3.5% | not published | 17.4% | not published | −9.6 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +27.5% | not published | 37.9% | not published | −163.5 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +34.9% | not published | 67.8% | not published | −243.2 pts | not published |
| Since launch AMYY Sep 2025 · XVAD Sep 2026 | +36.0% | 0.0% | 69.5% | 0.0% | −245.3 pts | +0.4 pts |
AMYY and XVAD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
AMYY and XVAD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMYY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, AMYY paid 67.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 43.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +34.9%. AMD (AMD) returned +278.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 243.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 68.2%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Sep 1, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XVAD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, XVAD paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. AMD (AMD) returned −0.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, AMYY against XVAD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amyy-vs-xvad
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMYY against XVAD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amyy-vs-xvad Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, AMYY against XVAD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amyy-vs-xvad
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). AMYY against XVAD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amyy-vs-xvad
- Markdown
- [AMYY against XVAD (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amyy-vs-xvad)