Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

AIPI vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AIPI paid 30.4% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AIPI and RYLD

Net assets: $490m on Oct 27, 2026 for REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
30.4%
AIPI cash paid, 1 year
12.1%
RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+15.5%
AIPI total return, 1 year
+12.1%
RYLD total return, 1 year
AIPI · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 1.9 pts ahead of SPY
AIPI
+15.5%
SPY
+13.6%

1.9 pts ahead of SPY

AIPI over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −19.4%, total +15.5%, SPY +13.6%, +1.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

SPY

+13.6%

AIPI

+15.5%

30.4% of it arrived as cash

1.9 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.9 pts ahead of SPY

AIPI over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −19.4%, total +15.5%, SPY +13.6%, +1.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

SPY

+13.6%

AIPI

+15.5%

30.4% as cash

1.9 pts ahead of SPY

30.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. AIPI over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −19.4%, total +15.5%, SPY +13.6%, +1.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
RYLD · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 2 pts behind IWM
RYLD
+12.1%
IWM
+14.1%

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

2 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% as cash

2 pts behind IWM

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RYLD costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; RYLD is 2.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

AIPI vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureAIPIRYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+15.5%+12.1%
Price change, 1 yearfell 19.4%fell 0.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 8, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 1.9 ptsbehind by 2.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$496m$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score36.3AIPI57.6RYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 123 weekly returns
AIPI RYLD
Return
Total return edge AIPI +44.7% +27.1%
Annualized edge AIPI +16.9% +10.7%
Price return edge RYLD −34.5% −4.9%
Risk
Volatility edge RYLD 21.3% 11.0%
Max drawdown edge RYLD −24.9% −15.3%
Downside capture 116.5% 62.8%
Beta 1.22 0.54
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge AIPI (slight) 0.64 0.60
Sortino edge AIPI 0.92 0.78
Treynor 0.112 0.063
Calmar edge RYLD (slight) 0.68 0.70
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.4% a year −1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.19 −0.43
Information ratio 0.12 −0.38
Tracking error 11.7% 13.9%

Each against its own benchmark: AIPI against SPY, Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026; RYLD against IWM, May 3, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

AIPI returned more: +44.7% to +27.1%. RYLD swung less: 11.0% to 21.3%. RYLD fell less at its worst: −15.3% to −24.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: AIPI vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureAIPIRYLDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+44.7%+27.1%AIPIPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+10.7%AIPITotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−34.5%−4.9%RYLDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%11.0%RYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.0%8.4%RYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.9%−15.3%RYLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture130.1%33.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture116.5%62.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.220.54Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.720.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.640.60AIPI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.920.78AIPIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1120.063Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.680.70RYLD (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.4% a year−1.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.19−0.43Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−16.0% to +13.2%−7.0% to +4.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.12−0.38Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.7%13.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 123 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AIPI and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AIPI RYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AIPI
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. 12.93%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 9.11%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.92%
Astera Labs, Inc 7.80%
DATADOG, INC. 7.21%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.50%
SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 4.28%
IONQ Inc 3.92%
Only in RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.94%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AIPI REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying weekly RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Issuer REX Global X
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 34.3% 11.5%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 30.4% 12.1%
Price change, 1 year −19.4% −0.6%
Total return, 1 year +15.5% +12.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +13.6% +14.1%
Ahead or behind +1.9 pts −2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 2.4 years 7.5 years
Net assets, AIPI as of Oct 27, 2026 and RYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $490m $1.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: AIPI vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAIPIRYLDAIPIRYLDAIPIRYLD
3 months+19.0%−0.3%9.7%2.9%+12.9 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+18.5%+6.8%15.9%6.2%+9.4 pts+2.9 pts
1 year+15.5%+12.1%30.4%12.1%+1.9 pts−2.1 pts
3 years–+38.8%–35.9%–−40.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: AIPI Jun 2024 · RYLD Apr 2019+58.9%+49.0%67.1%68.4%+8.5 pts−50.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FFB71ED934

AIPI and RYLD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. AIPI paid 30.4% and RYLD 12.1% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 18.3 points.
  2. What each is measured against. AIPI is measured against S&P 500 through SPY and RYLD against Russell 2000 through IWM.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AIPI

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AIPI paid 30.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.3%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 8, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RYLD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +14.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, AIPI or RYLD?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AIPI paid 30.4% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.1%, so AIPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, AIPI or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, AIPI returned +15.5% and RYLD +12.1% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, AIPI or RYLD?
AIPI charges 0.65% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so RYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AIPI against RYLD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aipi-vs-ryld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.