Data as of .
AIPI vs RYLD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year AIPI paid 31.3% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RYLD scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIPI and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AIPI | Only in RYLD |
|---|---|
| CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. 11.93% | GLOBAL X RUSSELL 2000 ETF 99.96% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 8.40% | CASH 0.04% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.23% | |
| Astera Labs, Inc 7.20% | |
| DATADOG, INC. 6.65% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.15% | |
| SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 3.95% | |
| IONQ Inc 3.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIPI | RYLD | AIPI | RYLD | AIPI | RYLD | |
| 3 months | +8.2% | +3.9% | 8.5% | 3.1% | +8.2 pts | +5.1 pts |
| 6 months | +21.7% | +13.1% | 16.8% | 6.3% | −10.6 pts | −4.5 pts |
| 1 year | +23.7% | +18.1% | 31.3% | 12.3% | −12.0 pts | −3.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +30.9% | not published | 32.7% | not published | −31.7 pts |
| Since launch | +54.8% | +51.9% | 63.7% | 67.2% | −36.0 pts | −51.8 pts |
| AIPI REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF Covered call on AIQ, paying weekly | RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF Covered call on IWM, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy | Russell 2000 (IWM) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 35.0% | 12.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 31.3% | 12.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −12.2% | +4.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.7% | +18.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +35.7% | +21.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −12.0 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 100% |
| Age | 829 days | 2699 days |
AIPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AIPI paid 31.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.7%. AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy returned +35.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.0%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
RYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, RYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +21.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, AIPI or RYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AIPI paid 31.3% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.3%, so AIPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, AIPI or RYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, AIPI returned +23.7% and RYLD returned +18.1% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so AIPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, AIPI or RYLD?
- AIPI charges 0.65% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so RYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIPI against RYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aipi-vs-ryld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.