AHD vs DACL: which paid, and which earned it?

AHD and DACL both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF and REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF.

10.1%
AHD cash paid, since launch
0.6%
DACL cash paid, since launch
+17.7%
AHD total return, since launch
+0.5%
DACL total return, since launch
AHD · since launch to Sep 30, 202634 pts behind HOOD
AHD
+17.7%
HOOD
+51.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

10.1% as cash

34 pts behind HOOD

Total return, distributions reinvested

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

10.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

DACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.2 pts ahead of SPY
DACL
+0.5%
SPY
−1.7%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +51.7%. DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAHDDACLAHDDACLAHDDACL
3 months+9.1%not published5.1%not published+5.5 ptsnot published
Since launch
AHD May 2026 · DACL Aug 2026
+17.7%+0.5%10.1%0.6%−34.0 pts+2.2 pts

AHD and DACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

AHD
GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF · Autocallable on HOOD, paying monthly
DACL
REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
Issuer GraniteShares REX
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Robinhood (HOOD) S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 32.6% 6.6%
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026) 0.6% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +6.9% −0.1%
Total return, 1 year +17.7% (since launch on May 19, 2026) +0.5% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +51.7% −1.7%
Ahead or behind −34.0 pts +2.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 17% not published
Age 134 days 48 days
Net assets $3m $4m

AHD and DACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

AHD in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, AHD paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.7%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned +51.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 34.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.6%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 17% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

DACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 13, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, DACL paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −1.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, AHD or DACL?
AHD charges 1.07% a year and DACL charges 0.65%, so DACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, AHD against DACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ahd-vs-dacl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.