Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ACYS vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+11.6 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: ACYS ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.05 pts
A year: ACYS 0.75%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Apr 23, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.05 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACYS vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACYSMPIM
Paid and earned
Price changerose 1.1% (since Apr 23, 2026)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.70%
Net assets$671mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.3%
ACYS cash paid, since launch, Apr 23, 2026
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+4.4%
ACYS total return, since launch, Apr 23, 2026
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
ACYS · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 2.8 pts ahead of IWM
ACYS
+4.4%
IWM
+1.6%

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

ACYS since launch: paid 3.3%, price +1.1%, total +4.4%, IWM +1.6%, +2.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

IWM

+1.6%

ACYS

+4.4%

3.3% as cash

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

ACYS since launch: paid 3.3%, price +1.1%, total +4.4%, IWM +1.6%, +2.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

IWM

+1.6%

ACYS

+4.4%

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

3.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYS since launch: paid 3.3%, price +1.1%, total +4.4%, IWM +1.6%, +2.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM, paying monthly MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) not set
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 8.0% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.3% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +1.1% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +4.4% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +1.6% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind +2.8 pts (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 16% not published
Age 203 days 92 days
Net assets $671m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACYS vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYSMPIMACYSMPIMACYSMPIM
3 months+1.0%−10.6%2.0%3.0%+9.0 ptsnot measured
6 months+3.1%–3.2%–+4.7 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: ACYS Apr 2026 · MPIM Aug 2026+4.4%−10.0%3.3%3.0%+2.8 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACYS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACYS

Over the period from its first trade on Apr 23, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYS paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.8 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 16% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYS or MPIM?
ACYS charges 0.75% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACYS against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACYS and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ACYS and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

ACYS +1.0%MPIM −10.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACYS +1.0%, MPIM −10.6%: ACYS +11.6 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.