Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ACYB vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+1.1 pts
1 month to Nov 12, 2026: JULJ ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.04 pts
A year: ACYB 0.75%, JULJ 0.79%, per filings dated Jul 1, 2026 and Oct 7, 2026
Overlap
0%
Share of the two books held in common, holdings dated Nov 11, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACYB costs 0.04 points a year less; JULJ is 3.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACYB vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACYBJULJ
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+4.8%
Price changefell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026)fell 0.9% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$4.0m$14m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Key numbers
0.0%
ACYB cash paid, since launch, Oct 7, 2026
5.6%
JULJ cash paid, 1 year
−0.6%
ACYB total return, since launch, Oct 7, 2026
+4.8%
JULJ total return, 1 year
ACYB · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
ACYB
−0.6%
none

Not measured

ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

ACYB

−0.6%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

ACYB

−0.6%

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
JULJ · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 7.2 pts behind SPY
JULJ
+4.8%
SPY
+12.0%

7.2 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.9%, total +4.8%, SPY +12.0%, −7.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

JULJ

+4.8%

5.6% of it arrived as cash

7.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.2 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.9%, total +4.8%, SPY +12.0%, −7.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

JULJ

+4.8%

7.2 pts behind SPY

5.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.9%, total +4.8%, SPY +12.0%, −7.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACYB and JULJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACYB JULJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACYB
ACYB Autocall Derivative BNP -0.46%
ACYB Autocall Derivative JPMorgan -0.50%
ACYB Autocall Derivative Citi -0.51%
Only in JULJ
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACYB FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Buffer & Resilient Income ETF · Autocallable JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark not set S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established quarterly
Payout rate, annualized not published 5.4%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch, Oct 7, 2026) 5.6%
Price change, 1 year −0.6% (since launch, Oct 7, 2026) −0.9%
Total return, 1 year −0.6% (since launch, Oct 7, 2026) +4.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.0%
Ahead or behind not available −7.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 39%
Age 36 days 3.4 years
Net assets, ACYB as of Nov 11, 2026 and JULJ as of Nov 12, 2026 $4.0m $14m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACYB vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYBJULJACYBJULJACYBJULJ
3 months–+0.8%–1.3%–+3.2 pts
6 months–+2.2%–2.7%–+0.5 pts
1 year–+4.8%–5.6%–−7.2 pts
3 years–+17.9%–17.2%–−60.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · JULJ Jul 2023−0.6%+21.0%0.0%19.0%not measured−56.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACYB and JULJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACYB

Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.

JULJ

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYB or JULJ?
ACYB charges 0.75% a year and JULJ charges 0.79%, so ACYB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACYB against JULJ, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-julj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACYB and JULJ both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ACYB and JULJ

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACYB −1.1%JULJ 0.0%
Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACYB −1.1%, JULJ 0.0%: JULJ +1.1 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.