Data as of .
ACSP vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and YSPC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and YSPC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in YSPC |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 43.24% |
| United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 34.02% | |
| United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.09% | |
| SPCX 10/16/2026 150.01 C 6.39% | |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 5.82% | |
| SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 162.500 0.62% | |
| SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 157.500 0.07% | |
| SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 152.500 -0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | YSPC | ACSP | YSPC | ACSP | YSPC | |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +6.4% | 0.0% | 10.9% | −2.1 pts | +5.3 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | not established | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 35 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $32m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or YSPC?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.