Data as of .
ACSP vs KIQQ: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and KIQQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and KIQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in KIQQ |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% |
| NVIDIA CORP 8.90% | |
| APPLE INC 8.20% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 6.17% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.14% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.50% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | KIQQ | ACSP | KIQQ | ACSP | KIQQ | |
| 3 months | not published | −3.2% | not published | 1.9% | not published | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.9% | not published | 4.5% | not published | −12.3 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +6.0% | 0.0% | 5.8% | −2.1 pts | −9.9 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | KraneShares |
| Strategy | option income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 6.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +15.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 254 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $3m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or KIQQ?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and KIQQ charges 0.79%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against KIQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-kiqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.