Data as of .
JOYT vs KIQQ: which paid, and which earned it?
JOYT and KIQQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JOYT and KIQQ hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JOYT | KIQQ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.64% | 8.90% |
| Apple, Inc. | 6.51% | 8.20% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 5.68% | 6.17% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 4.78% | 4.50% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.98% | 2.76% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 2.73% | 3.31% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 1.78% | 5.14% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 1.45% | 3.19% |
| Lam Research Corp. | 1.08% | 1.58% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. | 0.69% | 0.82% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.84% |
| Walmart, Inc. | 0.52% | 2.37% |
| Only in JOYT | Only in KIQQ |
|---|---|
| Alphabet, Inc. 5.94% | +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% |
| Wells Fargo & Co. 2.22% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.91% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% |
| Mastercard, Inc. 1.59% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.15% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plc 1.37% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 3.07% |
| Bank of America Corp. 1.28% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.00% |
| AbbVie, Inc. 1.27% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 1.90% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. 1.18% | APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOYT | KIQQ | JOYT | KIQQ | JOYT | KIQQ | |
| 3 months | +3.8% | −3.2% | 0.2% | 1.9% | +1.5 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +11.9% | 0.4% | 4.5% | −6.1 pts | −12.3 pts |
| 1 year | +15.9% | not published | 0.7% | not published | −0.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +19.6% | +6.0% | 0.7% | 5.8% | −1.1 pts | −9.9 pts |
| JOYT JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF Option income on SPY, paying quarterly | KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | KraneShares |
| Strategy | option income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 0.7% | 6.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.7% | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +15.2% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.9% | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +15.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 395 days | 254 days |
| Net assets | $108m | $3m |
JOYT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JOYT paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 15.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.7%, paid quarterly.
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, JOYT or KIQQ?
- JOYT charges 0.35% a year and KIQQ charges 0.79%, so JOYT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JOYT against KIQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/joyt-vs-kiqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.