Data as of .
ACKY vs NLSI: which paid, and which earned it?
ACKY and NLSI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and NLSI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACKY | NLSI |
|---|---|---|
| Mastercard Inc | 5.11% | 2.86% |
| Only in ACKY | Only in NLSI |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 11.56% | Micron Technology Inc 14.23% |
| Brookfield Corp 11.16% | F5 Inc 3.90% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 10.74% | Progressive Corp/The 3.80% |
| Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50% | Adobe Inc 3.37% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 10.23% | Jack Henry & Associates Inc 3.32% |
| Amazon.com Inc 9.95% | Universal Health Services Inc 3.23% |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86% | Insulet Corp 3.19% |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.19% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACKY | NLSI | ACKY | NLSI | ACKY | NLSI | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +15.6% | 3.7% | 1.4% | −1.5 pts | +13.3 pts |
| 6 months | +5.8% | +24.6% | 7.7% | 2.8% | −12.2 pts | +6.6 pts |
| 1 year | −1.3% | not published | 13.9% | not published | −17.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −0.4% | +19.3% | 14.0% | 4.0% | −19.1 pts | +7.3 pts |
| ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | NLSI NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.7% | 5.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 2.89% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.9% | 4.0% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −15.1% | +14.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | +19.3% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +12.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −17.9 pts | +7.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 374 days | 282 days |
| Net assets | $45m | $5m |
ACKY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.
NLSI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 10, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, NLSI paid 4.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 31, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACKY or NLSI?
- ACKY charges 0.95% a year and NLSI charges 2.89%, so ACKY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against NLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-nlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.