Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

ACKY vs LJUL: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ACKY paid 14.0% of its price in cash against LJUL’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACKY and LJUL

Net assets: $45m on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF, and $9.0m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July.

At a glance
14.0%
ACKY cash paid, 1 year
5.2%
LJUL cash paid, 1 year
+6.4%
ACKY total return, 1 year
+5.3%
LJUL total return, 1 year
ACKY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.4 pts behind SPY
ACKY
+6.4%
SPY
+14.8%

8.4 pts behind SPY

ACKY over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −8.5%, total +6.4%, SPY +14.8%, −8.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

ACKY

+6.4%

14.0% of it arrived as cash

8.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.4 pts behind SPY

ACKY over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −8.5%, total +6.4%, SPY +14.8%, −8.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

ACKY

+6.4%

8.4 pts behind SPY

14.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACKY over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −8.5%, total +6.4%, SPY +14.8%, −8.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LJUL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.5 pts behind VOO
LJUL
+5.3%
VOO
+14.8%

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

5.2% of it arrived as cash

9.5 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

9.5 pts behind VOO

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

LJUL costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; ACKY is 5.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACKY vs LJUL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACKYLJUL
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+6.4%+5.3%
Price change, 1 yearfell 8.5%fell 0.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate98% of the Sep 29, 2026 payment40% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.95%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$45m$8.9m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · LJUL scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score34.4ACKY57.8LJUL

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and LJUL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACKY LJUL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACKY
Microsoft Corp 12.01%
Brookfield Corp 11.51%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 10.79%
Uber Technologies Inc 9.89%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 9.73%
Amazon.com Inc 9.54%
Meta Platforms Inc 9.13%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.26%
Only in LJUL
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly
Strategy covered call buffer with income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 14.5% 5.3%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 14.0% 5.2%
Price change, 1 year −8.5% 0.0%
Total return, 1 year +6.4% +5.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −8.4 pts −9.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 98% 40%
Age 1.2 years 2.3 years
Net assets, ACKY as of Nov 3, 2026 and LJUL as of Nov 4, 2026 $45m $9.0m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACKY vs LJUL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACKYLJULACKYLJULACKYLJUL
3 months+4.8%+1.1%3.7%1.3%+5.0 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+1.0%+2.8%6.9%2.6%−4.0 pts−2.3 pts
1 year+6.4%+5.3%14.0%5.2%−8.4 pts−9.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ACKY Sep 2025 · LJUL Jul 2024+6.9%+14.0%16.2%12.6%−12.6 pts−30.5 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACKY and LJUL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACKY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ACKY paid 14.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.5%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Sep 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

LJUL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or LJUL?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ACKY paid 14.0% of its starting price in cash and LJUL paid 5.2%, so ACKY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or LJUL?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned +6.4% and LJUL +5.3% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or LJUL?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and LJUL charges 0.79%, so LJUL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACKY against LJUL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-ljul

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.