Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs LJAN: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACKY paid 13.9% of its price in cash against LJAN’s 4.9%, though LJAN returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
4.9%LJAN cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
+5.1%LJAN total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LJAN scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACKY 12.7LJAN 40.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
LJAN11.4 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LJAN+5.1%4.9% as cash11.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LJAN+5.1%11.4 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and LJAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in LJAN
Microsoft Corp 11.56%TREASURY BILL 97.22%
Brookfield Corp 11.16%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
Meta Platforms Inc 10.23%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
Amazon.com Inc 9.95%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22%TREASURY BILL 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and LJAN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYLJANACKYLJANACKYLJAN
3 months+0.8%+1.3%3.7%1.2%−1.5 pts−1.0 pts
6 months+5.8%+4.8%7.7%2.5%−12.2 pts−13.2 pts
1 year−1.3%+5.1%13.9%4.9%−17.9 pts−11.4 pts
Since launch−0.4%+16.1%14.0%13.9%−19.1 pts−50.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and LJAN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
LJAN
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesInnovator
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.7%4.8%
Expense ratio0.95%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%4.9%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+5.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−11.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days990 days
Net assets$45m$12m

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

LJAN in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJAN paid 4.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or LJAN?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and LJAN paid 4.9%, so ACKY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or LJAN?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and LJAN returned +5.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LJAN returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or LJAN?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and LJAN charges 0.79%, so LJAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against LJAN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against LJAN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-ljan Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources