Which is cheaper, ACBE or MPDY?

ACBE charges 0.60% a year and MPDY charges 0.70%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share on X Download as PDF

ACBE vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap

+4.7 pts

1 month to Nov 12, 2026: ACBE ahead, total return

Fee gap

0.10 pts

A year: ACBE 0.60%, MPDY 0.70%, per filings dated Aug 7, 2026 and Aug 24, 2026

Overlap

–

No book read for both funds

Net flow

–

Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACBE costs 0.10 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACBE vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	ACBE	MPDY
Paid and earned
Measure	ACBE	MPDY
Price change	fell 2.5% (since Sep 10, 2026)	fell 11.2% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Measure	ACBE	MPDY
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	not published
Cost and size
Measure	ACBE	MPDY
Expense ratio	0.60%	0.70%
Net assets	$3.6m	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Measure	ACBE	MPDY
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Key numbers

1.4%

ACBE cash paid, since launch, Sep 10, 2026

2.3%

MPDY cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026

−1.0%

ACBE total return, since launch, Sep 10, 2026

−9.1%

MPDY total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026

ACBE · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 1.2 pts behind SPY

ACBE

−1.0%

SPY

+0.2%

1.2 pts behind SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 1.4%, price −2.5%, total −1.0%, SPY +0.2%, −1.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBE

−1.0%

1.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.2 pts behind SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 1.4%, price −2.5%, total −1.0%, SPY +0.2%, −1.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBE

−1.0%

1.2 pts behind SPY

1.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 1.4%, price −2.5%, total −1.0%, SPY +0.2%, −1.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPDY · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured

MPDY

−9.1%

none

Not measured

MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPDY

−9.1%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPDY

−9.1%

2.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACBE Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY MPDY m+ DualYield Autocall ETF · Autocallable

Issuer Pacer m+

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) not set

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.4% 13.3%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.70%

Cash paid, 1 year 1.4% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) 2.3% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)

Price change, 1 year −2.5% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −11.2% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)

Total return, 1 year −1.0% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −9.1% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.2% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not published

Ahead or behind −1.2 pts (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not available

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 63 days 92 days

Net assets $3.6m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACBE vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBE	MPDY	ACBE	MPDY	ACBE	MPDY
3 months	–	−10.3%	–	2.3%	–	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: ACBE Sep 2026 · MPDY Aug 2026	−1.0%	−9.1%	1.4%	2.3%	−1.2 pts	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

ACBE

Over the period from its first trade on Sep 10, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACBE paid 1.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid periodically.

MPDY

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPDY paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.1%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBE or MPDY?: ACBE charges 0.60% a year and MPDY charges 0.70%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBE vs SALI ACBE vs ACII ACBE vs ACYB ACBE vs ACYN MPDY vs ACBH MPDY vs JANH MPDY vs JULJ MPDY vs JANJ

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →ACBE on its own →MPDY on its own →ACBE dividend history →MPDY dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ACBE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ACBE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Pacer website ↗

MPDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MPDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACBE against MPDY, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-mpdy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACBE and MPDY both write options for income.

ACBE on its own →MPDY on its own →

Growth of 100

ACBE and MPDY

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACBE −3.7%MPDY −8.4%

Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACBE −3.7%, MPDY −8.4%: ACBE +4.7 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.