Data as of .
SQBA vs ZDEK: which one stands where?
As of Sep 21, 2026 ZDEK can fall 5.2% before its buffer engages and SQBA 0.8%, and SQBA resets 10 days sooner.
These are two different products. ZDEK is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. SQBA is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
SQBA resets first, on Nov 20, 2026, 60 days from now; ZDEK runs to Nov 30, 2026, 70 days. SQBA can still gain 1.8% before its cap, ZDEK 1.3%. A fall from here reaches SQBA’s buffer after 0.8% and ZDEK’s after 5.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Gap to the reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQBA | ZDEK | SQBA | ZDEK | |
| 3 months | not published | +1.5% | not published | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +4.7% | not published | −13.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +6.5% | not published | −10.1 pts |
| SQBA FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 2.6%, over a period ending Nov 20, 2026 | ZDEK Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 6.8%, over a period ending Nov 30, 2026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Innovator |
| Reference index | SPY | SPY |
| Buffer | 15% | 100% |
| Outcome period | Aug 24, 2026 to Nov 20, 2026 | Nov 30, 2025 to Nov 30, 2026 |
| Days left | 60 | 70 |
| Starting cap | +2.6% | +6.8% |
| Can still gain | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Fall before buffer | 0.8% | 5.2% |
| Protection left, index points | 15.0% of 15.0% | 100.0% of 100.0% |
| Index return this period | +1.1% | +13.3% |
| Fund return this period | +0.6% | +4.8% |
| State today | Open | At cap |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $3m | $109m |
SQBA in plain words
From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 1.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 60 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Nov 20, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
ZDEK in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.8% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 5.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 70 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Nov 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
- Which has more room to gain, SQBA or ZDEK?
- From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, SQBA can gain about 1.8% before its cap and ZDEK about 1.3%, so SQBA has more room left this period.
- Which resets first, SQBA or ZDEK?
- SQBA ends its outcome period on Nov 20, 2026 and ZDEK on Nov 30, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
- Which is cheaper, SQBA or ZDEK?
- SQBA charges 0.85% a year and ZDEK charges 0.79%, so ZDEK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SQBA against ZDEK, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/sqba-vs-zdek Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.