Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SQBA vs XNOV: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 XNOV can fall 9.2% before its buffer engages and SQBA 0.8%.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November.

0.8%SQBA can fall this far before its buffer
9.2%XNOV can fall this far before its buffer
1.8%SQBA can still gain
0.9%XNOV can still gain
SQBABetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer−15.0% floor0% period start+2.6% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+2.6% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%
XNOVAt its cap
15 pts of buffer+11.1% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+11.1% capTODAY · SPY +17.4%15 pts+11.1%−15.0% floor0% start+11.1% capTODAY · SPY +17.4%

These are two different products. XNOV is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. SQBA is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Both are First Trust funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

SQBA resets first, on Nov 20, 2026, 60 days from now; XNOV runs to Nov 20, 2026, 60 days. SQBA can still gain 1.8% before its cap, XNOV 0.9%. A fall from here reaches SQBA’s buffer after 0.8% and XNOV’s after 9.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

SQBA and XNOV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
SQBAXNOVSQBAXNOV
3 monthsnot published+2.2%not published0.0 pts
6 monthsnot published+8.5%not published−9.5 pts
1 yearnot published+10.6%not published−6.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SQBA and XNOV on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SQBA
FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 2.6%, over a period ending Nov 20, 2026
XNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 11.1%, over a period ending Nov 20, 2026
IssuerFirst TrustFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%15%
Outcome periodAug 24, 2026 to Nov 20, 2026Nov 24, 2025 to Nov 20, 2026
Days left6060
Starting cap+2.6%+11.1%
Can still gain1.8%0.9%
Fall before buffer0.8%9.2%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+1.1%+17.4%
Fund return this period+0.6%+9.2%
State todayOpenAt cap
Expense ratio0.85%0.85%
Net assets$3m$58m

SQBA in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 1.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 60 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Nov 20, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XNOV in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.1% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 9.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 14.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, SQBA or XNOV?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, SQBA can gain about 1.8% before its cap and XNOV about 0.9%, so SQBA has more room left this period.
Which resets first, SQBA or XNOV?
SQBA ends its outcome period on Nov 20, 2026 and XNOV on Nov 20, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, SQBA or XNOV?
SQBA charges 0.85% a year and XNOV charges 0.85%, so SQBA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SQBA against XNOV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SQBA against XNOV, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/sqba-vs-xnov Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources