Data as of .
SIXP vs ZMAR: which one stands where?
As of Sep 21, 2026 ZMAR can fall 3.6% before its buffer engages and SIXP 1.0%, and SIXP resets 1 days sooner.
These are two different products. ZMAR is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. SIXP is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
SIXP resets first, on Feb 28, 2027, 159 days from now; ZMAR runs to Feb 28, 2027, 160 days. SIXP can still gain 6.5% before its cap, ZMAR 2.9%. A fall from here reaches SIXP’s buffer after 1.0% and ZMAR’s after 3.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Gap to the reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIXP | ZMAR | SIXP | ZMAR | |
| 3 months | +2.2% | +1.5% | 0.0 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +10.5% | +4.2% | −7.5 pts | −13.9 pts |
| 1 year | +12.1% | +5.9% | −4.5 pts | −10.7 pts |
| SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Mar Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.6%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027 | ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 6.7%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027 | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | AllianzIM | Innovator |
| Reference index | SPY | SPY |
| Buffer | 10% | 100% |
| Outcome period | Sep 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027 | Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027 |
| Days left | 159 | 160 |
| Starting cap | +7.6% | +6.7% |
| Can still gain | 6.5% | 2.9% |
| Fall before buffer | 1.0% | 3.6% |
| Protection left, index points | 10.0% of 10.0% | 100.0% of 100.0% |
| Index return this period | +0.9% | +12.8% |
| Fund return this period | +0.7% | +3.3% |
| State today | Open | At cap |
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $53m | $112m |
SIXP in plain words
From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 159 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
ZMAR in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.7% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 160 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which has more room to gain, SIXP or ZMAR?
- From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, SIXP can gain about 6.5% before its cap and ZMAR about 2.9%, so SIXP has more room left this period.
- Which resets first, SIXP or ZMAR?
- SIXP ends its outcome period on Feb 28, 2027 and ZMAR on Feb 28, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
- Which is cheaper, SIXP or ZMAR?
- SIXP charges 0.74% a year and ZMAR charges 0.79%, so SIXP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIXP against ZMAR, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/sixp-vs-zmar Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.