Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DFEB vs ZMAR: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 DFEB can fall 11.7% before its buffer engages and ZMAR 3.6%, and DFEB resets 9 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March.

11.7%DFEB can fall this far before its buffer
3.6%ZMAR can fall this far before its buffer
4.1%DFEB can still gain
2.9%ZMAR can still gain
DFEBAt its cap
25 pts of buffer+11.9%−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+11.9% capTODAY · SPY +12.2%25 pts−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+11.9% capTODAY · SPY +12.2%
ZMARAt its cap
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+6.7% capTODAY · SPY +12.8%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+6.7% capTODAY · SPY +12.8%

These are two different products. ZMAR is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DFEB is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DFEB resets first, on Feb 19, 2027, 151 days from now; ZMAR runs to Feb 28, 2027, 160 days. DFEB can still gain 4.1% before its cap, ZMAR 2.9%. A fall from here reaches DFEB’s buffer after 11.7% and ZMAR’s after 3.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DFEB and ZMAR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DFEBZMARDFEBZMAR
3 months+2.2%+1.5%−0.1 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+9.1%+4.2%−8.9 pts−13.9 pts
1 year+11.2%+5.9%−5.4 pts−10.7 pts
3 years+44.8%not published−33.6 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DFEB and ZMAR on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFEB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February
Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 11.9%, over a period ending Feb 19, 2027
ZMAR
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 6.7%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer5% to 30%100%
Outcome periodFeb 23, 2026 to Feb 19, 2027Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027
Days left151160
Starting cap+11.9%+6.7%
Can still gain4.1%2.9%
Fall before buffer11.7%3.6%
Protection left, index points25.0% of 25.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+12.2%+12.8%
Fund return this period+6.6%+3.3%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets$447m$112m

DFEB in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.9% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 4.1% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 11.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 15.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 151 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

ZMAR in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.7% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 160 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DFEB or ZMAR?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DFEB can gain about 4.1% before its cap and ZMAR about 2.9%, so DFEB has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DFEB or ZMAR?
DFEB ends its outcome period on Feb 19, 2027 and ZMAR on Feb 28, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DFEB or ZMAR?
DFEB charges 0.85% a year and ZMAR charges 0.79%, so ZMAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFEB against ZMAR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFEB against ZMAR, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dfeb-vs-zmar Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources