Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
QBQF vs QBQV: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 QBQF can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages and QBQV 0.0%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QBQF and QBQVNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $13m for AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF - Jan and $52m for AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF - Jan.
QBQF: reference −6.5% since period start, fund −1.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +3.6%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QBQF: reference −6.5% since period start, fund −1.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +3.6%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.QBQV: reference −6.5% since period start, fund −3.6%; buffer 0 to −5; cap +7.6%; Buffer exhausted. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QBQV: reference −6.5% since period start, fund −3.6%; buffer 0 to −5; cap +7.6%; Buffer exhausted. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.74% a year; QBQV is 4.0 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | QBQF | QBQV |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.74% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $13m | $52m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | QBQF | QBQV | QBQF | QBQV |
| 3 months | −1.1% | −2.8% | +2.4 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | −0.2% | −2.3% | +0.3 pts | −1.7 pts |
| Since launchQBQF Apr 2026 · QBQV Apr 2026 | +2.4% | +3.5% | −16.1 pts | −14.9 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Both are AllianzIM funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
QBQF resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 57 days from now; QBQV runs to Dec 31, 2026, 57 days. QBQF can still gain 4.6% before its cap, QBQV 11.4%. A fall from here reaches QBQF’s buffer after 0.0% and QBQV’s after 0.0%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
QBQF
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.6% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 8.5% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 57 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
QBQV
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.4% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 0.0% of the 5.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QBQF against QBQV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/qbqf-vs-qbqv
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). QBQF against QBQV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/qbqf-vs-qbqv
[QBQF against QBQV (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/qbqf-vs-qbqv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.