Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DQSE vs QBQV: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 DQSE can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages and QBQV 0.0%, and QBQV resets 260 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DQSE and QBQVNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $24m for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - September and $52m for AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF - Jan.
DQSE: reference −4.1% since period start, fund −1.6%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.8%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DQSE: reference −4.1% since period start, fund −1.6%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.8%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.QBQV: reference −6.5% since period start, fund −3.6%; buffer 0 to −5; cap +7.6%; Buffer exhausted. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QBQV: reference −6.5% since period start, fund −3.6%; buffer 0 to −5; cap +7.6%; Buffer exhausted. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QBQV costs 0.16 points a year less; QBQV is 2.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DQSE | QBQV |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.74% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $24m | $52m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DQSE | QBQV | DQSE | QBQV |
| 3 months | – | −2.8% | – | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | – | −2.3% | – | −1.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DQSE Sep 2026 · QBQV Apr 2026 | −3.2% | +3.5% | +3.5 pts | −14.9 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. QBQV is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DQSE is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
They do not reset together. QBQV has 57 days of its period left and DQSE has 317, so the two are not the same bet on the same months.
Where each one stands today
QBQV resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 57 days from now; DQSE runs to Sep 17, 2027, 317 days. DQSE can still gain 19.8% before its cap, QBQV 11.4%. A fall from here reaches DQSE’s buffer after 0.0% and QBQV’s after 0.0%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DQSE
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 19.8% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 5.9% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 317 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Sep 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
QBQV
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.4% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 0.0% of the 5.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 57 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DQSE against QBQV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqse-vs-qbqv
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DQSE against QBQV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqse-vs-qbqv
[DQSE against QBQV (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqse-vs-qbqv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.