Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PMJA vs SIXJ: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 PMJA can fall 4.4% before its buffer engages and SIXJ 3.1%, and PMJA resets 1 days sooner.

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Jan.

4.4%PMJA can fall this far before its buffer
3.1%SIXJ can fall this far before its buffer
1.9%PMJA can still gain
4.9%SIXJ can still gain
PMJAAt its cap
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+6.6% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+6.6% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%
SIXJBetween buffer and cap
10 pts−10.0% floor0% period start+8.2% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%−10.0% floor0% start+8.2% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. PMJA is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. SIXJ is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

PMJA resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 101 days from now; SIXJ runs to Dec 31, 2026, 102 days. PMJA can still gain 1.9% before its cap, SIXJ 4.9%. A fall from here reaches PMJA’s buffer after 4.4% and SIXJ’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

PMJA and SIXJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
PMJASIXJPMJASIXJ
3 months+1.5%+2.3%−0.8 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+4.4%+11.1%−13.6 pts−7.0 pts
1 year+5.9%+12.1%−10.7 pts−4.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+48.7%not published−29.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PMJA and SIXJ on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PMJA
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 6.6%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Jan
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 8.2%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
IssuerPGIMAllianzIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer100%10%
Outcome periodJan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026Jul 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026
Days left101102
Starting cap+6.6%+8.2%
Can still gain1.9%4.9%
Fall before buffer4.4%3.1%
Protection left, index points100.0% of 100.0%10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period+13.5%+3.6%
Fund return this period+4.1%+2.8%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.50%0.74%
Net assets$6m$152m

PMJA in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.6% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 101 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SIXJ in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 102 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, PMJA or SIXJ?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, PMJA can gain about 1.9% before its cap and SIXJ about 4.9%, so SIXJ has more room left this period.
Which resets first, PMJA or SIXJ?
PMJA ends its outcome period on Dec 31, 2026 and SIXJ on Dec 31, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, PMJA or SIXJ?
PMJA charges 0.50% a year and SIXJ charges 0.74%, so PMJA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PMJA against SIXJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PMJA against SIXJ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmja-vs-sixj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources