Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PMDE vs SQBA: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 PMDE can fall 5.2% before its buffer engages and SQBA 0.8%, and SQBA resets 10 days sooner.

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December and FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF.

5.2%PMDE can fall this far before its buffer
0.8%SQBA can fall this far before its buffer
1.4%PMDE can still gain
1.8%SQBA can still gain
PMDEAt its cap
full floor beneath+7%full floor0% period start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +13.2%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +13.2%
SQBABetween buffer and cap
15 pts−15.0% floor0% period start+2.6% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%−15.0% floor0% start+2.6% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%

These are two different products. PMDE is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. SQBA is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

SQBA resets first, on Nov 20, 2026, 60 days from now; PMDE runs to Nov 30, 2026, 70 days. PMDE can still gain 1.4% before its cap, SQBA 1.8%. A fall from here reaches PMDE’s buffer after 5.2% and SQBA’s after 0.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

PMDE and SQBA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
PMDESQBAPMDESQBA
3 months+1.6%not published−0.6 ptsnot published
6 months+4.9%not published−13.1 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PMDE and SQBA on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PMDE
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.0%, over a period ending Nov 30, 2026
SQBA
FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 2.6%, over a period ending Nov 20, 2026
IssuerPGIMFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer100%15%
Outcome periodDec 1, 2025 to Nov 30, 2026Aug 24, 2026 to Nov 20, 2026
Days left7060
Starting cap+7.0%+2.6%
Can still gain1.4%1.8%
Fall before buffer5.2%0.8%
Protection left, index points100.0% of 100.0%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+13.2%+1.1%
Fund return this period+5.0%+0.6%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.50%0.85%
Net assets$9m$3m

PMDE in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.4% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 5.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 70 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Nov 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SQBA in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 1.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 60 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Nov 20, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, PMDE or SQBA?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, PMDE can gain about 1.4% before its cap and SQBA about 1.8%, so SQBA has more room left this period.
Which resets first, PMDE or SQBA?
PMDE ends its outcome period on Nov 30, 2026 and SQBA on Nov 20, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, PMDE or SQBA?
PMDE charges 0.50% a year and SQBA charges 0.85%, so PMDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PMDE against SQBA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PMDE against SQBA, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmde-vs-sqba Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources