ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsResearch
My portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFOpen live

KJUN vs SCJN: which one stands where?

As of Oct 1, 2026 KJUN can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages and SCJN 0.0%. Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - Jun and Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF.

KJUNBuffer working
Buffer workingKJUN: reference −4.3% since period start, fund −0.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +19.5%; Buffer working.10.7 of 15 pts left+19.5% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+19.5% capTODAY · IWM −4.3%Buffer workingKJUN: reference −4.3% since period start, fund −0.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +19.5%; Buffer working.10.7 pts+19.5% to cap−15.0% floor0% start+19.5% capTODAY · IWM −4.3%

KJUN: reference −4.3% since period start, fund −0.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +19.5%; Buffer working.

SCJNBuffer working
Buffer workingSCJN: reference −3.8% since period start, fund −0.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +19.6%; Buffer working.11.2 of 15 pts of buffer left+19.6% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+19.6% capTODAY · IWM −3.8%Buffer workingSCJN: reference −3.8% since period start, fund −0.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +19.6%; Buffer working.11.2 pts+19.6% to cap−15.0% floor0% start+19.6% capTODAY · IWM −3.8%

SCJN: reference −3.8% since period start, fund −0.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +19.6%; Buffer working.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · SCJN scores higherIf the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
0.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Where each one stands today

KJUN resets first, on May 31, 2027, 243 days from now; SCJN runs to May 31, 2027, 243 days. A fall from here reaches KJUN’s buffer after 0.0% and SCJN’s after 0.0%. Both track IWM, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

Total returnGap to the reference
WindowKJUNSCJNKJUNSCJN
3 months−2.8%−2.8%+4.2 pts+4.2 pts
6 months+2.1%not published−9.8 ptsnot published
1 year+6.1%not published−9.9 ptsnot published

KJUN and SCJN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

KJUN
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - Jun · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on IWM and caps the gain at 19.5%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
SCJN
Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on IWM and caps the gain at 19.6%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
Issuer Innovator Corgi
Reference index IWM IWM
Buffer 15% 15%
Outcome period May 31, 2026 to May 31, 2027 Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027
Days left 243 243
Starting cap +19.5% +19.6%
Can still gain 20.0% not published
Fall before buffer 0.0% 0.0%
Protection left, index points 10.7% of 15.0% 11.2% of 15.0%
Index return this period −4.3% −3.8%
Fund return this period −0.7% −0.4%
State today Buffer working Buffer working
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.30%
Net assets $57m $1m

KJUN and SCJN on the same fields, as of Oct 1, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

KJUN in plain words

From its price on Oct 1, 2026, the fund can gain about 20.0% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 10.7% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 243 days remained on Oct 1, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SCJN in plain words

Protection left, in index points: 11.2% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, KJUN or SCJN?
KJUN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and SCJN on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, KJUN or SCJN?
KJUN charges 0.79% a year and SCJN charges 0.30%, so SCJN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
KJUN vs SMAYSCJN vs SMAY
IWM →KJUN on its own →SCJN on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
KJUN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗Innovator page for KJUN ↗Corgi website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, KJUN against SCJN, data as of Oct 1, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/kjun-vs-scjn

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.