Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JULP vs XBJL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 JULP can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and XBJL 3.1%.

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul.

3.3%JULP can fall this far before its buffer
3.1%XBJL can fall this far before its buffer
12.4%JULP can still gain
10.3%XBJL can still gain
JULPBetween buffer and cap
12 pts of buffer+3.6%+12.6% more to the cap−12.0% floor0% period start+16.2% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%12 pts+12.6% to cap−12.0% floor0% start+16.2% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
XBJLBetween buffer and cap
9 pts of buffer+3.6%+10.2% more to the cap−9.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%9 pts−9.0% floor0% start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. XBJL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JULP is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

JULP resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 282 days from now; XBJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 282 days. JULP can still gain 12.4% before its cap, XBJL 10.3%. A fall from here reaches JULP’s buffer after 3.3% and XBJL’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

JULP and XBJL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
JULPXBJLJULPXBJL
3 months+2.2%+2.4%−0.1 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+9.9%+8.0%−8.1 pts−10.0 pts
1 year+10.7%+9.5%−5.8 pts−7.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+40.8%not published−37.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JULP and XBJL on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JULP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July
Absorbs the first 12% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 16.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
XBJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul
Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerPGIMInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer12%9%
Outcome periodJul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left282282
Starting cap+16.2%+13.8%
Can still gain12.4%10.3%
Fall before buffer3.3%3.1%
Protection left, index points12.0% of 12.0%9.0% of 9.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+3.6%
Fund return this period+2.9%+3.0%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
Net assets$37m$77m

JULP in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XBJL in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, JULP or XBJL?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, JULP can gain about 12.4% before its cap and XBJL about 10.3%, so JULP has more room left this period.
Which resets first, JULP or XBJL?
JULP ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and XBJL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, JULP or XBJL?
JULP charges 0.50% a year and XBJL charges 0.79%, so JULP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JULP against XBJL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULP against XBJL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/julp-vs-xbjl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources