Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DDTL vs JULP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 JULP can fall 3.1% before its buffer engages and DDTL 3.0%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DDTL and JULP
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $90m for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Jul and $43m for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July.
DDTL: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DDTL: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.JULP: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.7%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +16.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
JULP: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.7%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +16.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
JULP costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; DDTL is 2.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DDTL | JULP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.5% | +10.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.6% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $90m | $43m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DDTL | JULP | DDTL | JULP |
| 3 months | +0.9% | +0.6% | +1.2 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +4.1% | +4.2% | −0.4 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 1 year | +9.5% | +10.5% | −4.1 pts | −3.0 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DDTL Jul 2025 · JULP May 2024 | +14.8% | +33.9% | −9.3 pts | −14.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. JULP is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDTL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
DDTL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 238 days from now; JULP runs to Jun 30, 2027, 238 days. DDTL can still gain 11.8% before its cap, JULP 12.6%. A fall from here reaches DDTL’s buffer after 3.0% and JULP’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DDTL
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULP
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.6% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DDTL against JULP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddtl-vs-julp
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DDTL against JULP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddtl-vs-julp
[DDTL against JULP (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddtl-vs-julp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.