Data as of .
JULC vs XBJL: which one stands where?
As of Sep 21, 2026 XBJL can fall 3.1% before its buffer engages and JULC 2.1%, and XBJL resets 3 days sooner.
These are two different products. XBJL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JULC is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
XBJL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 282 days from now; JULC runs to Jun 30, 2027, 285 days. A fall from here reaches JULC’s buffer after 2.1% and XBJL’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Gap to the reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULC | XBJL | JULC | XBJL | |
| 3 months | not published | +2.4% | not published | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +8.0% | not published | −10.0 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.5% | not published | −7.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +40.8% | not published | −37.6 pts |
| JULC Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027 | XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027 | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | Innovator |
| Reference index | SPY | SPY |
| Buffer | 10% | 9% |
| Outcome period | Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027 | Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027 |
| Days left | 285 | 282 |
| Starting cap | +18.2% | +13.8% |
| Can still gain | not published | 10.3% |
| Fall before buffer | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Protection left, index points | 10.0% of 10.0% | 9.0% of 9.0% |
| Index return this period | +2.1% | +3.6% |
| Fund return this period | +2.5% | +3.0% |
| State today | Open | Open |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $2m | $77m |
JULC in plain words
The fund's price can fall 2.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 285 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
XBJL in plain words
From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which resets first, JULC or XBJL?
- JULC ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and XBJL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
- Which is cheaper, JULC or XBJL?
- JULC charges 0.30% a year and XBJL charges 0.79%, so JULC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULC against XBJL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/julc-vs-xbjl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.