CPSJ vs JULC: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 JULC can fall 3.1% before its buffer engages and CPSJ 1.4%. Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - July and Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.
JULC costs 0.39 points a year less; CPSJ is 32.2 times larger.
| CPSJ | JULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $50m | $2m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | not published |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CPSJ: reference +3.2% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer −0 to floor; cap +7.6%; Full floor.
JULC: reference +3.2% since period start, fund +3.2%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.2%; Between buffer and cap.
These are two different products. CPSJ is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JULC is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CPSJ resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 271 days from now; JULC runs to Jun 30, 2027, 271 days. A fall from here reaches CPSJ’s buffer after 1.4% and JULC’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPSJ | JULC | CPSJ | JULC |
| 3 months | +1.2% | +2.9% | −2.4 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +4.0% | not published | −14.0 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +5.3% | not published | −11.0 pts | not published |
CPSJ and JULC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CPSJ and JULC on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CPSJ in plain words
The fund's price can fall 1.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 99.9% of the 99.9% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 271 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULC in plain words
The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CPSJ against JULC, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CPSJ against JULC, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CPSJ against JULC, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). CPSJ against JULC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc
- Markdown
- [CPSJ against JULC (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc)