Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CPSJ vs JULC: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
CPSJ can fall 1.7% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and JULC 1.1% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CPSJ and JULC
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $51m for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July and $1.2m for Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.
CPSJ: reference +2.8% since period start, fund +1.5%; buffer Floor; cap +7.7%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.JULC: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
JULC: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.Pair scorecard
JULC costs 0.39 points a year less; CPSJ is far larger, $51m against $1.2m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CPSJ | JULC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $51m | $1.2m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPSJ | JULC | CPSJ | JULC |
| 3 months | +0.7% | +0.2% | +1.0 pts | +0.6 pts |
| 6 months | +2.2% | – | −2.2 pts | – |
| 1 year | +5.3% | – | −8.2 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: CPSJ Jul 2024 · JULC Jul 2026 | +16.9% | +2.8% | −23.7 pts | −0.1 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. CPSJ is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JULC is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CPSJ resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 238 days from now; JULC runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches CPSJ’s buffer after 1.7% and JULC’s after 1.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CPSJ
The fund's price can fall 1.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULC
The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CPSJ against JULC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CPSJ against JULC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc
[CPSJ against JULC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsj-vs-julc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.