Data as of Nov 3, 2026.
HJLY vs JULC: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 3, 2026 HJLY can fall 1.1% before its buffer engages and JULC 1.1%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HJLY and JULCNet assets on Nov 4, 2026: $892,052 for Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $1.2m for Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.
HJLY: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.5%; buffer Floor; cap +9.0%; Full floor. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
Data to Nov 3, 2026.JULC: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
JULC: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.30% a year.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | HJLY | JULC |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 4, 2026 | $892,052 | $1.2m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | HJLY | JULC | HJLY | JULC |
| 3 months | +0.3% | +0.2% | +0.7 pts | +0.6 pts |
| Since launchHJLY Jul 2026 · JULC Jul 2026 | +1.5% | +2.8% | −1.4 pts | −0.1 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 3, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. HJLY is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JULC is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are Corgi funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
HJLY resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 239 days from now; JULC runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches HJLY’s buffer after 1.1% and JULC’s after 1.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
HJLY
The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULC
Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HJLY against JULC, data as of Nov 3, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/hjly-vs-julc
ETFIQ. (Nov 3, 2026). HJLY against JULC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/hjly-vs-julc
[HJLY against JULC (ETFIQ, Nov 3, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/hjly-vs-julc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.