Which resets first, GJUN or JULC?

GJUN ends its outcome period on Jun 17, 2027 and JULC on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.

Which is cheaper, GJUN or JULC?

GJUN charges 0.85% a year and JULC charges 0.30%, so JULC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Buffer ETFs

GJUN vs JULC: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share on X Download as PDF

GJUN can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and JULC 1.1% as of Nov 3, 2026.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GJUN and JULC

Net assets: $497m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June, and $1.2m on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.

GJUN on its own →JULC on its own →

At a glance

GJUN Between buffer and cap

GJUN: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JULC Between buffer and cap

JULC: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JULC costs 0.55 points a year less; GJUN is far larger, $497m against $1.2m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GJUN vs JULC: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Measure	GJUN	JULC
Return
Measure	GJUN	JULC
Total return, 1 year	+8.3%	not published
Drawdown
Measure	GJUN	JULC
Index fall to the buffer	2.6%	1.1%
Benchmark
Measure	GJUN	JULC
What it tracks	SPY	SPY
Cost and size
Measure	GJUN	JULC
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.30%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$497m	$1.2m
Holdings
Measure	GJUN	JULC
Holdings in common	not published

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · GJUN scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

IQ Buffer Score83.2GJUN38.7JULC

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

GJUN 83.2

JULC 38.7

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: GJUN vs JULC: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
	Total return		Gap to the reference's price return
Window	GJUN	JULC	GJUN	JULC
3 months	+0.7%	+0.2%	+1.1 pts	+0.6 pts
6 months	+3.3%	–	−1.2 pts	–
1 year	+8.3%	–	−5.3 pts	–
3 years	+40.7%	–	−35.7 pts	–
Since launchNot the same days: GJUN Jun 2023 · JULC Jul 2026	+41.3%	+2.8%	−34.1 pts	−0.1 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GJUN FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.3%, over a period ending Jun 17, 2027 JULC Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027

Issuer First Trust Corgi

Reference index SPY SPY

Buffer 15% 10%

Outcome period Jun 22, 2026 to Jun 17, 2027 Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027

Days left 225 239

Starting cap +13.3% +18.2%

Can still gain 9.8% not published

Fall before buffer 3.3% 1.1%

Protection left, index points 15.0% of 15.0% 10.0% of 10.0%

Index return this period +2.7% +1.2%

Fund return this period +2.5% +1.9%

State today Open Open

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.30%

Net assets, GJUN as of Nov 3, 2026 and JULC as of Nov 4, 2026 $497m $1.2m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

GJUN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 225 days from now; JULC runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches GJUN’s buffer after 3.3% and JULC’s after 1.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Alert

About each fund

GJUN

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 225 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JULC

The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, GJUN or JULC?: GJUN ends its outcome period on Jun 17, 2027 and JULC on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, GJUN or JULC?: GJUN charges 0.85% a year and JULC charges 0.30%, so JULC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

GJUN vs HJLY GJUN vs XBJL GJUN vs JULU GJUN vs AJUL JULC vs JULP JULC vs JULW JULC vs JULU JULC vs XBJL

Where to next

State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust →GJUN on its own →JULC on its own →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

GJUN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

First Trust page for GJUN ↗

JULC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

Corgi website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GJUN against JULC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gjun-vs-julc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.