Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GJAN vs PMFB: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 GJAN can fall 7.6% before its buffer engages and PMFB 4.0%, and GJAN resets 16 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February.

7.6%GJAN can fall this far before its buffer
4.0%PMFB can fall this far before its buffer
3.4%GJAN can still gain
2.6%PMFB can still gain
GJANAt its cap
15 pts+11.8%−15.0% floor0% period start+11.8% capTODAY · SPY +11.9%−15.0% floor0% start+11.8% capTODAY · SPY +11.9%
PMFBAt its cap
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+6.8% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+6.8% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%

These are two different products. PMFB is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. GJAN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

GJAN resets first, on Jan 15, 2027, 116 days from now; PMFB runs to Jan 31, 2027, 132 days. GJAN can still gain 3.4% before its cap, PMFB 2.6%. A fall from here reaches GJAN’s buffer after 7.6% and PMFB’s after 4.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

GJAN and PMFB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
GJANPMFBGJANPMFB
3 months+2.3%+1.5%0.0 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+10.3%+4.4%−7.7 pts−13.7 pts
1 year+10.8%+6.1%−5.8 pts−10.4 pts
3 years+39.9%not published−38.5 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GJAN and PMFB on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GJAN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 11.8%, over a period ending Jan 15, 2027
PMFB
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 6.8%, over a period ending Jan 31, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%100%
Outcome periodJan 20, 2026 to Jan 15, 2027Feb 1, 2026 to Jan 31, 2027
Days left116132
Starting cap+11.8%+6.8%
Can still gain3.4%2.6%
Fall before buffer7.6%4.0%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+11.9%+11.8%
Fund return this period+7.3%+3.6%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.85%0.50%
Net assets$441m$6m

GJAN in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.8% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.4% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 7.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jan 15, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PMFB in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.8% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.6% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 132 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jan 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, GJAN or PMFB?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, GJAN can gain about 3.4% before its cap and PMFB about 2.6%, so GJAN has more room left this period.
Which resets first, GJAN or PMFB?
GJAN ends its outcome period on Jan 15, 2027 and PMFB on Jan 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, GJAN or PMFB?
GJAN charges 0.85% a year and PMFB charges 0.50%, so PMFB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GJAN against PMFB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GJAN against PMFB, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gjan-vs-pmfb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources