CPSF vs PMFB: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 PMFB can fall 4.3% before its buffer engages and CPSF 4.1%, and CPSF resets 2 days sooner. Net assets on Oct 13, 2026: $35m for Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - February and $6m for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February.
PMFB costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; CPSF is 5.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| CPSF | PMFB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $35m | $6m |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.2% | +6.4% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 10.6% | 11.1% |
CPSF: reference +11.9% since period start, fund +3.8%; buffer Floor; cap +6.3%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
PMFB: reference +12.4% since period start, fund +4.0%; buffer Floor; cap +6.8%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Both are already at their cap, so neither gains from more rise in the index before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
CPSF resets first, on Jan 29, 2027, 108 days from now; PMFB runs to Jan 31, 2027, 110 days. A fall from here reaches CPSF’s buffer after 4.1% and PMFB’s after 4.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPSF | PMFB | CPSF | PMFB |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +1.6% | −1.8 pts | −1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +3.3% | +3.4% | −8.7 pts | −8.6 pts |
| 1 year | +6.2% | +6.4% | −11.2 pts | −10.9 pts |
| Since launch CPSF Feb 2025 · PMFB Feb 2025 | +10.9% | +11.2% | −19.3 pts | −18.9 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CPSF
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.3% for the period on Oct 13, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's price can fall 4.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 108 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jan 29, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About PMFB
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.8% for the period on Oct 13, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.2% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 110 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jan 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CPSF against PMFB, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-pmfb
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). CPSF against PMFB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-pmfb
[CPSF against PMFB (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-pmfb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.