Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

GFEB vs SIXP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 GFEB can fall 7.7% before its buffer engages and SIXP 1.1%, and GFEB resets 9 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GFEB and SIXP

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $369m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February and $215m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Mar.

At a glance
7.7%
GFEB can fall this far before its buffer
1.1%
SIXP can fall this far before its buffer
3.5%
GFEB can still gain
6.4%
SIXP can still gain
GFEB Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capGFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer+11.2% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+12.1% cap+0.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.2%Between buffer and capGFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer+11.2%−15.0% floor0% start+12.1% cap+0.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.2%

GFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

GFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SIXP Buffer working
Buffer workingSIXP: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +7.6%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.10 of 10 pts of buffer left+7.6% more to the cap−10.0% floor0% period start+7.6% capTODAY · SPY 0.0%Buffer workingSIXP: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +7.6%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.10 pts−10.0% floor0% start+7.6% cap+7.6% more to the capTODAY · SPY 0.0%

SIXP: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +7.6%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SIXP: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +7.6%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SIXP costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; GFEB is 1.7 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GFEB vs SIXP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureGFEBSIXP
Return
Total return, 1 year+11.2%+11.9%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer10.1%0.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$369m$215m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · GFEB scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score61.8GFEB30.8SIXP

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 8, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 138 weekly returns · each against SPY
GFEB SIXP
Return
Total return edge SIXP +32.4% +37.0%
Annualized edge SIXP +11.2% +12.6%
Price return edge SIXP +32.4% +37.0%
Risk
Volatility edge GFEB 6.8% 7.6%
Max drawdown edge GFEB −8.5% −9.8%
Downside capture 43.6% 49.8%
Beta 0.45 0.51
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SIXP (slight) 0.96 1.03
Sortino edge SIXP (slight) 1.42 1.52
Treynor 0.145 0.153
Calmar edge Tie 1.32 1.29
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +1.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.69 1.24
Information ratio −0.75 −0.66
Tracking error 8.2% 7.3%
Reading

From Mar 2024 to Oct 2026, SIXP returned more: +37.0% to +32.4%. GFEB swung less: 6.8% to 7.6%. GFEB fell less at its worst: −8.5% to −9.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GFEB vs SIXP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureGFEBSIXPSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+32.4%+37.0%SIXPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.2%+12.6%SIXPTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+32.4%+37.0%SIXPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility6.8%7.6%GFEBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.6%5.2%GFEBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−8.5%−9.8%GFEBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture35.6%42.0%100.0%SIXPShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture43.6%49.8%100.0%GFEBShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.450.511.00GFEB lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.951.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.961.03SIXP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.421.52SIXP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1450.1530.126SIXP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.321.29TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+1.4% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.691.24Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.5% to +3.2%−0.8% to +3.6%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.75−0.66SIXPReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error8.2%7.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 138 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: GFEB vs SIXP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowGFEBSIXPGFEBSIXP
3 months+1.5%+1.2%+1.8 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+4.3%+4.4%−0.2 pts−0.1 pts
1 year+11.2%+11.9%−2.4 pts−1.7 pts
3 years+45.4%–−31.0 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: GFEB Feb 2023 · SIXP Mar 2024+56.2%+37.9%−36.0 pts−11.6 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.1%, over a period ending Feb 19, 2027 SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Mar · Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.6%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 15% 10%
Outcome period Feb 23, 2026 to Feb 19, 2027 Sep 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027
Days left 107 116
Starting cap +12.1% +7.6%
Can still gain 3.5% 6.4%
Fall before buffer 7.7% 1.1%
Protection left, index points 15.0% of 15.0% 10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period +11.2% 0.0%
Fund return this period +7.4% +0.8%
State today Open Buffer working
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $369m $215m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

GFEB resets first, on Feb 19, 2027, 107 days from now; SIXP runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. GFEB can still gain 3.5% before its cap, SIXP 6.4%. A fall from here reaches GFEB’s buffer after 7.7% and SIXP’s after 1.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GFEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GFEB

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 3.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 107 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SIXP

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, GFEB or SIXP?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, GFEB can gain about 3.5% before its cap and SIXP about 6.4%, so SIXP has more room left this period.
Which resets first, GFEB or SIXP?
GFEB ends its outcome period on Feb 19, 2027 and SIXP on Feb 28, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, GFEB or SIXP?
GFEB charges 0.85% a year and SIXP charges 0.74%, so SIXP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GFEB against SIXP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gfeb-vs-sixp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.