Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

GFEB vs PMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 PMAR can fall 7.8% before its buffer engages and GFEB 7.7%, and GFEB resets 9 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GFEB and PMAR

Net assets: $369m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February, and $748m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Mar.

At a glance
7.7%
GFEB can fall this far before its buffer
7.8%
PMAR can fall this far before its buffer
3.5%
GFEB can still gain
4.0%
PMAR can still gain
GFEB Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capGFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer+11.2% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+12.1% cap+0.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.2%Between buffer and capGFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts+11.2%−15.0% floor0% start+12.1% cap+0.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.2%

GFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

GFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
PMAR Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capPMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer+11.7% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+12.8% cap+1.1% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.7%Between buffer and capPMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts+11.7%−15.0% floor0% start+12.8% cap+1.1% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.7%

PMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PMAR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; PMAR is 2.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GFEB vs PMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureGFEBPMAR
Return
Total return, 1 year+11.2%+11.6%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer10.1%10.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$369m$742m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · GFEB scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score61.8GFEB60.8PMAR

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 3, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 191 weekly returns · each against SPY
GFEB PMAR
Return
Total return edge Tie +54.0% +53.9%
Annualized edge Tie +12.5% +12.4%
Price return edge Tie +54.0% +53.9%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 6.9% 6.9%
Max drawdown edge PMAR (slight) −8.5% −8.2%
Downside capture 46.2% 45.6%
Beta 0.47 0.47
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 1.08 1.07
Sortino edge Tie 1.62 1.60
Treynor 0.157 0.156
Calmar edge PMAR (slight) 1.47 1.51
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.43 0.39
Information ratio −0.96 −0.97
Tracking error 7.6% 7.6%
Reading

From Mar 2023 to Oct 2026, GFEB and PMAR returned about the same: +54.0% and +53.9%. GFEB and PMAR swung about the same: 6.9% and 6.9%. PMAR fell slightly less at its worst: −8.2% to −8.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GFEB vs PMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureGFEBPMARSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+54.0%+53.9%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.5%+12.4%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+54.0%+53.9%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility6.9%6.9%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.6%4.6%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−8.5%−8.2%PMAR (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture37.9%37.5%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture46.2%45.6%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.470.471.00TieHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.081.07TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.621.60TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1570.1560.147TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.471.51PMAR (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.4% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.430.39Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.6% to +2.5%−1.6% to +2.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.96−0.97TieReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.6%7.6%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 191 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: GFEB vs PMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowGFEBPMARGFEBPMAR
3 months+1.5%+1.9%+1.8 pts+2.2 pts
6 months+4.3%+4.4%−0.2 pts−0.1 pts
1 year+11.2%+11.6%−2.4 pts−1.9 pts
3 years+45.4%+44.9%−31.0 pts−31.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: GFEB Feb 2023 · PMAR Mar 2020+56.2%+84.8%−36.0 pts−63.3 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.1%, over a period ending Feb 19, 2027 PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Mar · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.8%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 15% 15%
Outcome period Feb 23, 2026 to Feb 19, 2027 Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027
Days left 107 116
Starting cap +12.1% +12.8%
Can still gain 3.5% 4.0%
Fall before buffer 7.7% 7.8%
Protection left, index points 15.0% of 15.0% 15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period +11.2% +11.7%
Fund return this period +7.4% +7.9%
State today Open Open
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.79%
Net assets, GFEB as of Nov 3, 2026 and PMAR as of Nov 4, 2026 $369m $748m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

GFEB resets first, on Feb 19, 2027, 107 days from now; PMAR runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. GFEB can still gain 3.5% before its cap, PMAR 4.0%. A fall from here reaches GFEB’s buffer after 7.7% and PMAR’s after 7.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GFEB and PMAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GFEB

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 3.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 107 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PMAR

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, GFEB or PMAR?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, GFEB can gain about 3.5% before its cap and PMAR about 4.0%, so PMAR has more room left this period.
Which resets first, GFEB or PMAR?
GFEB ends its outcome period on Feb 19, 2027 and PMAR on Feb 28, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, GFEB or PMAR?
GFEB charges 0.85% a year and PMAR charges 0.79%, so PMAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GFEB against PMAR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gfeb-vs-pmar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.