Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

FMAR vs UAPR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 UAPR can fall 12.9% before its buffer engages and FMAR 11.3%, and FMAR resets 12 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FMAR and UAPR

Net assets: $1.2bn on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March, and $159m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Apr.

At a glance
11.3%
FMAR can fall this far before its buffer
12.9%
UAPR can fall this far before its buffer
4.0%
FMAR can still gain
3.7%
UAPR can still gain
FMAR At its cap
At its capFMAR: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +11.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +17.2%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.10 pts of buffer+17.2% gain captured−10.0% floor0% period start+17.2% capTODAY · SPY +18.2%At its capFMAR: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +11.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +17.2%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.+17.2%−10.0% floor0% start+17.2% cap10 pts of bufferTODAY · SPY +18.2%

FMAR: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +11.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +17.2%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FMAR: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +11.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +17.2%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
UAPR At its cap
At its capUAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +8.5%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +13.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.30 pts of buffer+13% gain captured−35.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+13.0% capfirst 5 pts are yours to loseTODAY · SPY +17.9%At its capUAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +8.5%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +13.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.30 pts of buffer+13%−35.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+13.0% capfirst 5 pts are yours to loseTODAY · SPY +17.9%

UAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +8.5%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +13.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

UAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +8.5%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +13.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

UAPR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points; FMAR is 7.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FMAR vs UAPR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureFMARUAPR
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+12.1%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer15.4%19.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$1.2bn$158m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · FMAR scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score16.6FMAR8.4UAPR

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Apr 1, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026 · 291 weekly returns · each against SPY
FMAR UAPR
Return
Total return edge FMAR +77.1% +42.8%
Annualized edge FMAR +10.8% +6.6%
Price return edge FMAR +77.1% +42.8%
Risk
Volatility edge UAPR 9.6% 6.2%
Max drawdown edge UAPR −13.5% −9.9%
Downside capture 59.2% 41.4%
Beta 0.59 0.36
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FMAR 0.74 0.49
Sortino edge FMAR 1.13 0.71
Treynor 0.122 0.084
Calmar edge FMAR 0.80 0.67
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.1% a year −0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.89 −0.66
Information ratio −0.46 −0.71
Tracking error 7.0% 10.3%
Reading

From Apr 2021 to Oct 2026, FMAR returned more: +77.1% to +42.8%. UAPR swung less: 6.2% to 9.6%. UAPR fell less at its worst: −9.9% to −13.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FMAR vs UAPR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureFMARUAPRSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+77.1%+42.8%FMARPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.8%+6.6%FMARTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+77.1%+42.8%FMARPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility9.6%6.2%UAPRSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.3%4.3%UAPRLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−13.5%−9.9%UAPRDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture46.1%26.9%100.0%FMARShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture59.2%41.4%100.0%UAPRShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.590.361.00UAPR lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.910.831.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.49FMARReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.130.71FMARReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1220.0840.104FMARReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.67FMARAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.1% a year−0.7% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.89−0.66Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.3% to +3.4%−2.9% to +1.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.46−0.71FMARReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.0%10.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 291 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: FMAR vs UAPR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowFMARUAPRFMARUAPR
3 months+1.7%+1.6%+2.1 pts+2.0 pts
6 months+4.7%+3.9%+0.2 pts−0.6 pts
1 year+16.0%+12.1%+2.4 pts−1.4 pts
3 years+51.0%+38.4%−25.4 pts−38.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FMAR Mar 2021 · UAPR Apr 2019+81.3%+46.7%−14.1 pts−121.5 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 17.2%, over a period ending Mar 19, 2027 UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Apr · Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 35.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 13.0%, over a period ending Mar 31, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 10% 5% to 35%
Outcome period Mar 23, 2026 to Mar 19, 2027 Mar 31, 2026 to Mar 31, 2027
Days left 135 147
Starting cap +17.2% +13.0%
Can still gain 4.0% 3.7%
Fall before buffer 11.3% 12.9%
Protection left, index points 10.0% of 10.0% 30.0% of 30.0%
Index return this period +18.2% +17.9%
Fund return this period +11.8% +8.5%
State today At cap At cap
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.79%
Net assets, FMAR as of Nov 3, 2026 and UAPR as of Nov 4, 2026 $1.2bn $159m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Both are already at their cap, so neither gains from more rise in the index before the period ends.

Where each one stands today

FMAR resets first, on Mar 19, 2027, 135 days from now; UAPR runs to Mar 31, 2027, 147 days. FMAR can still gain 4.0% before its cap, UAPR 3.7%. A fall from here reaches FMAR’s buffer after 11.3% and UAPR’s after 12.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FMAR and UAPR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FMAR

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +17.2% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 4.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 11.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 15.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 135 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Mar 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

UAPR

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +13.0% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 12.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 19.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 147 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, FMAR or UAPR?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, FMAR can gain about 4.0% before its cap and UAPR about 3.7%, so FMAR has more room left this period.
Which resets first, FMAR or UAPR?
FMAR ends its outcome period on Mar 19, 2027 and UAPR on Mar 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, FMAR or UAPR?
FMAR charges 0.85% a year and UAPR charges 0.79%, so UAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FMAR against UAPR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/fmar-vs-uapr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.