Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DMAY vs JUNC: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 DMAY can fall 8.8% before its buffer engages and JUNC 0.4%, and DMAY resets 13 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May and Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: DMAY scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

DMAY 54.8JUNC 38.10.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DMAYBetween buffer and cap
25 pts of buffer+4.7%+8.9% to cap−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+13.6% capTODAY · SPY +4.7%25 pts of buffer−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+13.6% capTODAY · SPY +4.7%
JUNCBetween buffer and cap
10 pts of buffer+17.7% more to the cap−10.0% floor0% period start+18.1% capTODAY · SPY +0.4%−10.0% floor0% start+18.1% capTODAY · SPY +0.4%

Where each one stands today

DMAY resets first, on May 21, 2027, 242 days from now; JUNC runs to May 31, 2027, 255 days. A fall from here reaches DMAY’s buffer after 8.8% and JUNC’s after 0.4%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DMAY and JUNC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DMAYJUNCDMAYJUNC
3 months+1.6%+1.8%−0.7 pts−0.5 pts
6 months+6.8%not published−11.3 ptsnot published
1 year+8.4%not published−8.2 ptsnot published
3 years+38.9%not published−39.5 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DMAY and JUNC on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DMAY
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 13.6%, over a period ending May 21, 2027
JUNC
Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.1%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustCorgi
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer5% to 30%10%
Outcome periodMay 18, 2026 to May 21, 2027Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027
Days left242255
Starting cap+13.6%+18.1%
Can still gain9.2%not published
Fall before buffer8.8%0.4%
Protection left, index points25.0% of 25.0%10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period+4.7%+0.4%
Fund return this period+3.2%+1.4%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.30%
Net assets$380m$1m

DMAY in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 9.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 242 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On May 21, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JUNC in plain words

The fund's price can fall 0.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 255 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, DMAY or JUNC?
DMAY ends its outcome period on May 21, 2027 and JUNC on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DMAY or JUNC?
DMAY charges 0.85% a year and JUNC charges 0.30%, so JUNC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DMAY against JUNC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DMAY against JUNC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dmay-vs-junc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources