Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DMAY vs HJUN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
DMAY can fall 8.7% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and HJUN 0.0% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DMAY and HJUN
Net assets: $390m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May, and $2.5m on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF.
DMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +13.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +13.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.HJUN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +1.3%; buffer Floor; cap +8.1%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
Data to Nov 3, 2026.Pair scorecard
HJUN costs 0.55 points a year less; DMAY is far larger, $390m against $2.5m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DMAY | HJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +8.3% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 8.4% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $390m | $2.5m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DMAY | HJUN | DMAY | HJUN |
| 3 months | +0.5% | +0.7% | +0.9 pts | +1.1 pts |
| 6 months | +3.2% | – | −1.3 pts | – |
| 1 year | +8.3% | – | −5.2 pts | – |
| 3 years | +40.5% | – | −35.9 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: DMAY May 2020 · HJUN Jun 2026 | +56.5% | +1.3% | −103.4 pts | +0.4 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. HJUN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DMAY is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
DMAY resets first, on May 21, 2027, 198 days from now; HJUN runs to May 31, 2027, 209 days. A fall from here reaches DMAY’s buffer after 8.7% and HJUN’s after 0.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DMAY
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 8.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 198 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 21, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
HJUN
Protection left, in index points: 99.5% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 209 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DMAY against HJUN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dmay-vs-hjun
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DMAY against HJUN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dmay-vs-hjun
[DMAY against HJUN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dmay-vs-hjun)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.