Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDFJ vs PBJA: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 PBJA can fall 7.2% before its buffer engages and DDFJ 6.5%.

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Jan and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January.

6.5%DDFJ can fall this far before its buffer
7.2%PBJA can fall this far before its buffer
1.9%DDFJ can still gain
2.6%PBJA can still gain
DDFJAt its cap
15 pts of buffer+9% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+9.0% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%15 pts+9%−15.0% floor0% start+9.0% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%
PBJAAt its cap
20 pts of buffer+10.4% gain captured−20.0% floor0% period start+10.4% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%20 pts of buffer+10.4%−20.0% floor0% start+10.4% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%

These are two different products. PBJA is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDFJ is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DDFJ resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 101 days from now; PBJA runs to Dec 31, 2026, 101 days. DDFJ can still gain 1.9% before its cap, PBJA 2.6%. A fall from here reaches DDFJ’s buffer after 6.5% and PBJA’s after 7.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DDFJ and PBJA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DDFJPBJADDFJPBJA
3 months+2.0%+2.1%−0.3 pts−0.1 pts
6 months+7.4%+8.7%−10.6 pts−9.4 pts
1 yearnot published+9.7%not published−6.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDFJ and PBJA on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDFJ
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Jan
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 9.0%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
PBJA
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 10.4%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%20%
Outcome periodDec 31, 2025 to Dec 31, 2026Jan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026
Days left101101
Starting cap+9.0%+10.4%
Can still gain1.9%2.6%
Fall before buffer6.5%7.2%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%20.0% of 20.0%
Index return this period+13.5%+13.5%
Fund return this period+6.3%+7.2%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.79%0.50%
Net assets$75m$66m

DDFJ in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +9.0% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 6.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 101 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PBJA in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +10.4% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.6% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 7.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DDFJ or PBJA?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DDFJ can gain about 1.9% before its cap and PBJA about 2.6%, so PBJA has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DDFJ or PBJA?
DDFJ ends its outcome period on Dec 31, 2026 and PBJA on Dec 31, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DDFJ or PBJA?
DDFJ charges 0.79% a year and PBJA charges 0.50%, so PBJA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDFJ against PBJA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDFJ against PBJA, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddfj-vs-pbja Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources