Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PBJA vs XBJA: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 XBJA can fall 8.5% before its buffer engages and PBJA 7.2%.

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jan.

7.2%PBJA can fall this far before its buffer
8.5%XBJA can fall this far before its buffer
2.6%PBJA can still gain
2.5%XBJA can still gain
PBJAAt its cap
20 pts of buffer+10.4% gain captured−20.0% floor0% period start+10.4% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%20 pts of buffer+10.4%−20.0% floor0% start+10.4% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%
XBJAAt its cap
9 pts of buffer+11.9% gain captured−9.0% floor0% period start+11.9% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%9 pts+11.9%−9.0% floor0% start+11.9% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%

These are two different products. XBJA is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. PBJA is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

PBJA resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 101 days from now; XBJA runs to Dec 31, 2026, 101 days. PBJA can still gain 2.6% before its cap, XBJA 2.5%. A fall from here reaches PBJA’s buffer after 7.2% and XBJA’s after 8.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

PBJA and XBJA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
PBJAXBJAPBJAXBJA
3 months+2.1%+2.6%−0.1 pts+0.4 pts
6 months+8.7%+11.1%−9.4 pts−7.0 pts
1 year+9.7%+11.1%−6.9 pts−5.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+38.3%not published−40.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PBJA and XBJA on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PBJA
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 10.4%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
XBJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jan
Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 11.9%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
IssuerPGIMInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer20%9%
Outcome periodJan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025 to Dec 31, 2026
Days left101101
Starting cap+10.4%+11.9%
Can still gain2.6%2.5%
Fall before buffer7.2%8.5%
Protection left, index points20.0% of 20.0%9.0% of 9.0%
Index return this period+13.5%+13.5%
Fund return this period+7.2%+8.7%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
Net assets$66m$93m

PBJA in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +10.4% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.6% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 7.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 101 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XBJA in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.9% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.5% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 8.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, PBJA or XBJA?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, PBJA can gain about 2.6% before its cap and XBJA about 2.5%, so PBJA has more room left this period.
Which resets first, PBJA or XBJA?
PBJA ends its outcome period on Dec 31, 2026 and XBJA on Dec 31, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, PBJA or XBJA?
PBJA charges 0.50% a year and XBJA charges 0.79%, so PBJA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PBJA against XBJA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBJA against XBJA, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pbja-vs-xbja Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources