Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DAUG vs PMSE: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 DAUG can fall 6.4% before its buffer engages and PMSE 0.8%, and DAUG resets 11 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September.

6.4%DAUG can fall this far before its buffer
0.8%PMSE can fall this far before its buffer
12.3%DAUG can still gain
7.5%PMSE can still gain
DAUGBetween buffer and cap
25 pts of buffer−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%25 pts−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%
PMSEFull floor
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+8.3% capTODAY · SPY +0.9%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+8.3% capTODAY · SPY +0.9%

These are two different products. PMSE is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DAUG is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DAUG resets first, on Aug 20, 2027, 333 days from now; PMSE runs to Aug 31, 2027, 344 days. DAUG can still gain 12.3% before its cap, PMSE 7.5%. A fall from here reaches DAUG’s buffer after 6.4% and PMSE’s after 0.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DAUG and PMSE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DAUGPMSEDAUGPMSE
3 months+1.5%+1.1%−0.7 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+9.2%+4.4%−8.8 pts−13.6 pts
1 year+9.1%+5.5%−7.5 pts−11.0 pts
3 years+40.8%not published−37.6 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DAUG and PMSE on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DAUG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August
Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Aug 20, 2027
PMSE
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 8.3%, over a period ending Aug 31, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer5% to 30%100%
Outcome periodAug 24, 2026 to Aug 20, 2027Sep 1, 2026 to Aug 31, 2027
Days left333344
Starting cap+13.8%+8.3%
Can still gain12.3%7.5%
Fall before buffer6.4%0.8%
Protection left, index points25.0% of 25.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+1.1%+0.9%
Fund return this period+0.6%+0.3%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.50%
Net assets$431m$7m

DAUG in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 6.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 6.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 333 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Aug 20, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PMSE in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 344 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Aug 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DAUG or PMSE?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DAUG can gain about 12.3% before its cap and PMSE about 7.5%, so DAUG has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DAUG or PMSE?
DAUG ends its outcome period on Aug 20, 2027 and PMSE on Aug 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DAUG or PMSE?
DAUG charges 0.85% a year and PMSE charges 0.50%, so PMSE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DAUG against PMSE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DAUG against PMSE, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/daug-vs-pmse Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources