CTJL vs JUNM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 CTJL can fall 4.2% before its buffer engages and JUNM 2.3%, and JUNM resets 13 days sooner. Net assets on Oct 13, 2026: $1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $68m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June.
CTJL costs 0.55 points a year less; JUNM is far larger, $68m against $1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| CTJL | JUNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $1m | $68m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +5.1% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 4.2% | 4.0% |
CTJL: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.3%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.3%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
CTJL: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.3%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.3%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
JUNM: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +1.5%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
These are two different products. JUNM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CTJL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
JUNM resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 247 days from now; CTJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 260 days. A fall from here reaches CTJL’s buffer after 4.2% and JUNM’s after 2.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CTJL | JUNM | CTJL | JUNM |
| 3 months | +2.4% | +1.1% | −1.1 pts | −2.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +2.5% | not published | −9.5 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.1% | not published | −12.3 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: CTJL Jul 2026 · JUNM Jun 2024 | +2.9% | +16.6% | −1.6 pts | −26.8 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CTJL
The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 260 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About JUNM
From its price on Oct 13, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 247 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CTJL against JUNM, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-junm
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). CTJL against JUNM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-junm
[CTJL against JUNM (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-junm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.