Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CTJL vs JUNM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
JUNM can fall 2.3% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CTJL 1.1% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CTJL and JUNM
Net assets: $1.3m on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series, and $66m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June.
CTJL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.6%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
CTJL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.6%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.JUNM: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +1.5%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CTJL costs 0.55 points a year less; JUNM is far larger, $66m against $1.3m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CTJL | JUNM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +4.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.3m | $66m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CTJL | JUNM | CTJL | JUNM |
| 3 months | +0.4% | +0.7% | +0.8 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | +2.0% | – | −2.5 pts |
| 1 year | – | +4.8% | – | −8.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CTJL Jul 2026 · JUNM Jun 2024 | +2.3% | +16.6% | −0.7 pts | −24.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. JUNM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CTJL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
JUNM resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 225 days from now; CTJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches CTJL’s buffer after 1.1% and JUNM’s after 2.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CTJL
The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JUNM
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 225 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CTJL against JUNM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-junm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CTJL against JUNM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-junm
[CTJL against JUNM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-junm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.