CPSF vs FEBT: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 FEBT can fall 8.9% before its buffer engages and CPSF 3.9%. Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - February and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Feb.
CPSF costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; FEBT is 4.6 times larger.
| CPSF | FEBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.74% |
| Net assets | $35m | $161m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.9% | +14.2% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CPSF: reference +10.7% since period start, fund +3.6%; buffer −0 to floor; cap +5.9%; At its cap.
FEBT: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +8.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.5%; Between buffer and cap.
These are two different products. CPSF is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. FEBT is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
CPSF is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
CPSF resets first, on Jan 29, 2027, 119 days from now; FEBT runs to Jan 31, 2027, 119 days. A fall from here reaches CPSF’s buffer after 3.9% and FEBT’s after 8.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPSF | FEBT | CPSF | FEBT |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +3.2% | −1.9 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +4.1% | +12.4% | −13.9 pts | −5.6 pts |
| 1 year | +5.9% | +14.2% | −10.4 pts | −2.0 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +63.5% | not published | −25.8 pts |
CPSF and FEBT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CPSF and FEBT on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CPSF in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +5.9% for the period on Oct 2, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's price can fall 3.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 99.6% of the 99.6% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 119 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Jan 29, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
FEBT in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. On Jan 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CPSF against FEBT, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-febt
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CPSF against FEBT, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-febt Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CPSF against FEBT, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-febt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). CPSF against FEBT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-febt
- Markdown
- [CPSF against FEBT (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsf-vs-febt)