Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CJUL vs PJUL: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
PJUL can fall 2.7% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CJUL 1.1% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CJUL and PJUL
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $1.0m for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $1.3bn for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Jul.
CJUL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
CJUL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.PJUL: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CJUL costs 0.49 points a year less; PJUL is far larger, $1.3bn against $1.0m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CJUL | PJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +9.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $1.0m | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUL | PJUL | CJUL | PJUL |
| 3 months | +0.7% | +0.6% | +1.1 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | +3.9% | – | −0.6 pts |
| 1 year | – | +9.3% | – | −4.2 pts |
| 3 years | – | +46.5% | – | −29.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CJUL Jul 2026 · PJUL Aug 2018 | +2.8% | +100.8% | −0.1 pts | −67.8 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Where each one stands today
PJUL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 238 days from now; CJUL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches CJUL’s buffer after 1.1% and PJUL’s after 2.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CJUL
The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
PJUL
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CJUL against PJUL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-pjul
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CJUL against PJUL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-pjul
[CJUL against PJUL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-pjul)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.