CAUG vs GJUL: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 GJUL can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and CAUG 1.6%, and GJUL resets 15 days sooner. Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series and FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July.
CAUG costs 0.55 points a year less; GJUL is 405.8 times larger.
| CAUG | GJUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $1m | $413m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +10.3% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CAUG: reference +1.6% since period start, fund +1.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap.
GJUL: reference +3.5% since period start, fund +2.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap.
A percentile among the 294 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Where each one stands today
GJUL resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 287 days from now; CAUG runs to Jul 31, 2027, 302 days. A fall from here reaches CAUG’s buffer after 1.6% and GJUL’s after 3.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CAUG | GJUL | CAUG | GJUL |
| 3 months | not published | +2.8% | not published | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +9.1% | not published | −8.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.3% | not published | −5.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +51.0% | not published | −38.3 pts |
CAUG and GJUL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CAUG and GJUL on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAUG in plain words
The fund's price can fall 1.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 302 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
GJUL in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 287 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CAUG against GJUL, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/caug-vs-gjul
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAUG against GJUL, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/caug-vs-gjul Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CAUG against GJUL, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/caug-vs-gjul
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). CAUG against GJUL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/caug-vs-gjul
- Markdown
- [CAUG against GJUL (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/caug-vs-gjul)