Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BALT vs OCTU: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 OCTU can fall 11.2% before its buffer engages and BALT 2.2%, and BALT resets 1 days sooner.

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF - Quarterly and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Oct.

2.2%BALT can fall this far before its buffer
11.2%OCTU can fall this far before its buffer
0.3%BALT can still gain
uncappedOCTU can still gain

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: BALT scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

BALT 97.8OCTU 17.90.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BALTAt its cap
20 pts of buffer−20.0% floor0% period start+2.5% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%20 pts−20.0% floor0% start+2.5% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
OCTUNo cap
15 pts of buffer+16.2% gained, no cap−15.0% floor0% period startno capTODAY · SPY +16.2%15 pts−15.0% floor0% startno capTODAY · SPY +16.2%

Where each one stands today

BALT resets first, on Sep 30, 2026, 9 days from now; OCTU runs to Sep 30, 2026, 10 days. A fall from here reaches BALT’s buffer after 2.2% and OCTU’s after 11.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

BALT and OCTU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
BALTOCTUBALTOCTU
3 months+1.7%+1.1%−0.6 pts−1.2 pts
6 months+4.1%+11.6%−13.9 pts−6.5 pts
1 year+6.3%+10.7%−10.3 pts−5.9 pts
3 years+24.3%not published−54.1 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BALT and OCTU on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF - Quarterly
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 2.5%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
OCTU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Oct
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and does not cap the gain, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
IssuerInnovatorAllianzIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer20%15%
Outcome periodJun 30, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026Oct 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026
Days left910
Starting cap+2.5%uncapped
Can still gain0.3%uncapped
Fall before buffer2.2%11.2%
Protection left, index points20.0% of 20.0%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+16.2%
Fund return this period+2.1%+11.7%
State todayAt capUncapped
Expense ratio0.69%0.74%
Net assets$2.9bn$58m

BALT in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +2.5% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 2.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 9 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

OCTU in plain words

This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 11.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 13.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 10 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, BALT or OCTU?
BALT ends its outcome period on Sep 30, 2026 and OCTU on Sep 30, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, BALT or OCTU?
BALT charges 0.69% a year and OCTU charges 0.74%, so BALT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BALT against OCTU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALT against OCTU, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-octu Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources