Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BALT vs QBSV: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 QBSV can fall 3.5% before its buffer engages and BALT 2.2%, and BALT resets 1 days sooner.

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF - Quarterly and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF - Jan.

2.2%BALT can fall this far before its buffer
3.5%QBSV can fall this far before its buffer
0.3%BALT can still gain
1.7%QBSV can still gain

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: BALT scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

BALT 97.8QBSV 1.70.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BALTAt its cap
20 pts of buffer+2.5%−20.0% floor0% period start+2.5% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%20 pts of buffer−20.0% floor0% start+2.5% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
QBSVBetween buffer and cap
5 pts of buffer+3.6%−5.0% floor0% period start+5.3% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%−5.0% floor0% start+5.3% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

Where each one stands today

BALT resets first, on Sep 30, 2026, 9 days from now; QBSV runs to Sep 30, 2026, 10 days. BALT can still gain 0.3% before its cap, QBSV 1.7%. A fall from here reaches BALT’s buffer after 2.2% and QBSV’s after 3.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

BALT and QBSV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
BALTQBSVBALTQBSV
3 months+1.7%+2.1%−0.6 pts−0.1 pts
6 months+4.1%not published−13.9 ptsnot published
1 year+6.3%not published−10.3 ptsnot published
3 years+24.3%not published−54.1 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BALT and QBSV on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF - Quarterly
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 2.5%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
QBSV
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF - Jan
Absorbs the first 5% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 5.3%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
IssuerInnovatorAllianzIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer20%5%
Outcome periodJun 30, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026Jul 1, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026
Days left910
Starting cap+2.5%+5.3%
Can still gain0.3%1.7%
Fall before buffer2.2%3.5%
Protection left, index points20.0% of 20.0%5.0% of 5.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+3.6%
Fund return this period+2.1%+3.4%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.69%0.64%
Net assets$2.9bn$27m

BALT in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +2.5% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 2.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 9 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

QBSV in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 1.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 5.0% of the 5.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 10 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, BALT or QBSV?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, BALT can gain about 0.3% before its cap and QBSV about 1.7%, so QBSV has more room left this period.
Which resets first, BALT or QBSV?
BALT ends its outcome period on Sep 30, 2026 and QBSV on Sep 30, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, BALT or QBSV?
BALT charges 0.69% a year and QBSV charges 0.64%, so QBSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BALT against QBSV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALT against QBSV, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-qbsv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources