BALT vs CPSY: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 CPSY can fall 4.6% before its buffer engages and BALT 0.2%. Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF - Quarterly and Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - January.
their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; BALT is 106.7 times larger.
| BALT | CPSY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Net assets | $3.1bn | $29m |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +5.9% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
BALT: reference +0.9% since period start, fund +0.2%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +2.4%; Between buffer and cap.
CPSY: reference +12.7% since period start, fund +4.3%; buffer −1 to floor; cap +5.9%; At its cap.
These are two different products. CPSY is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. BALT is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
CPSY is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
BALT resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 90 days from now; CPSY runs to Dec 31, 2026, 90 days. A fall from here reaches BALT’s buffer after 0.2% and CPSY’s after 4.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BALT | CPSY | BALT | CPSY |
| 3 months | +2.1% | +1.7% | −1.5 pts | −1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +4.4% | +4.4% | −13.6 pts | −13.6 pts |
| 1 year | +6.5% | +5.9% | −9.7 pts | −10.3 pts |
| 3 years | +26.1% | not published | −63.2 pts | not published |
BALT and CPSY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
BALT and CPSY on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALT in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 90 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
CPSY in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +5.9% for the period on Oct 2, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's price can fall 4.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 99.5% of the 99.5% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, BALT against CPSY, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-cpsy
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALT against CPSY, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-cpsy Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, BALT against CPSY, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-cpsy
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). BALT against CPSY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-cpsy
- Markdown
- [BALT against CPSY (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-cpsy)