APOC vs DDFA: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 DDFA can fall 8.8% before its buffer engages and APOC 0.6%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $78m for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct and $57m for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Apr.
Both cost 0.79% a year; APOC is 1.3 times larger.
| APOC | DDFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $78m | $57m |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.0% | not published |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.0% | 16.5% |
APOC: reference +2.1% since period start, fund +0.6%; buffer Floor; cap +4.3%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
DDFA: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +9.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.4%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
DDFA: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +9.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.4%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. APOC is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDFA is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
DDFA is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
APOC resets first, on Mar 31, 2027, 173 days from now; DDFA runs to Mar 31, 2027, 173 days. APOC can still gain 3.7% before its cap, DDFA 3.5%. A fall from here reaches APOC’s buffer after 0.6% and DDFA’s after 8.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | APOC | DDFA | APOC | DDFA |
| 3 months | +1.5% | +2.2% | −1.6 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 6 months | +3.0% | +5.8% | −11.6 pts | −8.8 pts |
| 1 year | +3.0% | not published | −13.0 pts | not published |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APOC in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 3.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 173 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
DDFA in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +13.4% for the period on Oct 9, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.5% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 8.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, APOC against DDFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apoc-vs-ddfa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). APOC against DDFA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apoc-vs-ddfa
[APOC against DDFA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apoc-vs-ddfa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.