Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

XLK vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, XLK returned +27.1% to XOP's +62.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about XLK and XOP

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF and $4.6bn for State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

At a glance
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
+62.5%
XOP total return, 1 year
0.08%
XLK expense ratio
0.35%
XOP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 35.4 points; XLK is far larger, $125.0bn against $4.6bn.

XLK vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureXLKXOP
Return
Total return, 1 year+27.1%+62.5%
Drawdown
Below its high5.4%, high on Oct 6, 202624.8%, high on Jun 23, 2014
Benchmark
What it tracksTechnology Select Sector IndexS&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$125.0bn$4.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,060 weekly returns
XLK XOP
Return
Total return edge XLK +2,251.2% +71.5%
Annualized edge XLK +16.8% +2.7%
Price return edge XLK +1,702.6% +29.3%
Risk
Volatility edge XLK 20.9% 37.0%
Max drawdown edge XLK −50.7% −89.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK 0.77 0.21
Sortino edge XLK 1.14 0.30
Calmar edge XLK 0.33 0.03
Reading

XLK returned more: +2,251.2% to +71.5%. XLK swung less: 20.9% to 37.0%. XLK fell less at its worst: −50.7% to −89.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: XLK vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureXLKXOPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+2,251.2%+71.5%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.8%+2.7%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,702.6%+29.3%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.9%37.0%XLKSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%26.4%XLKLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.7%−89.6%XLKDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.770.21XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.140.30XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.330.03XLKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,060 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, XLK and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first XLK XOP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
APPLE INC 14.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 11.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.78%
BROADCOM INC 4.70%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.02%
INTEL CORP 2.72%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
Only in XOP
RANGE RESOURCES CORP 3.48%
APA CORP 2.92%
MURPHY OIL CORP 2.89%
OVINTIV INC 2.85%
EOG RESOURCES INC 2.82%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.82%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 2.81%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 2.79%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Technology Tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year +27.1% +62.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +13.5 pts vs SPY not measured
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.35%
Holdings 76 52
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $125.0bn $4.6bn

XLK and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-DAE33DE23A

XLK and XOP do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index and XOP follows S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 XLK returned +27.1% and XOP +62.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 35.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLK and XOP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XOP

XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +62.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 24.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, XLK or XOP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, XLK returned +27.1% and XOP +62.5%.
Which is cheaper, XLK or XOP?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, XLK against XOP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/xlk-vs-xop

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.