Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VCLT vs VPU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VCLT returned −5.9% to VPU's −3.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VCLT and VPU

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.5bn for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF and $7.7bn for Vanguard Utilities ETF.

At a glance
−5.9%
VCLT total return, 1 year
−3.3%
VPU total return, 1 year
0.03%
VCLT expense ratio
0.09%
VPU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCLT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points.

VCLT vs VPU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVCLTVPU
Return
Total return, 1 year−5.9%−3.3%
Drawdown
Below its high17.8%, high on Sep 22, 20218.9%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Utilities 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.5bn$7.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight90%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund52.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 4, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 881 weekly returns
VCLT VPU
Return
Total return edge VPU +101.2% +404.8%
Annualized edge VPU +4.2% +10.0%
Price return edge VPU −6.3% +187.2%
Risk
Volatility edge VCLT 12.5% 17.1%
Max drawdown edge VPU (slight) −34.0% −32.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VPU 0.27 0.56
Sortino edge VPU 0.39 0.81
Calmar edge VPU 0.12 0.31
Reading

VPU returned more: +404.8% to +101.2%. VCLT swung less: 12.5% to 17.1%. VPU fell slightly less at its worst: −32.4% to −34.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: VCLT vs VPU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVCLTVPUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+101.2%+404.8%VPUPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.2%+10.0%VPUTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−6.3%+187.2%VPUPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility12.5%17.1%VCLTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.7%11.7%VCLTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.0%−32.4%VPU (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.56VPUReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.390.81VPUReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.120.31VPUAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 881 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VCLT and VPU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VCLT VPU
MKTLIQ 1.03% 0.24%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VCLT
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.37%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.36%
CVS Health Corp 0.33%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
AT&T Inc 0.24%
AT&T Inc 0.24%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0.24%
Only in VPU
NextEra Energy Inc 11.39%
Southern Co 6.74%
Duke Energy Corp 6.41%
Constellation Energy Corp 5.72%
American Electric Power Co Inc 4.66%
Dominion Energy Inc 3.84%
Sempra 3.68%
Vistra Corp 3.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond Tracks an index of Utilities
Total return, 1 year −5.9% −3.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −3.3% (FUTY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs FUTY
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.09%
Holdings 2562 70
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.5bn $7.7bn

VCLT and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0630232504

VCLT and VPU do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. VCLT follows Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index and VPU follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Utilities 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VCLT returned −5.9% and VPU −3.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VCLT

VCLT tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 17.8% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPU

VPU tracks an index of Utilities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.3% with distributions reinvested, against −3.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Utilities 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 70 positions, with the top ten at 52.3%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VCLT or VPU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCLT returned −5.9% and VPU −3.3%.
Which is cheaper, VCLT or VPU?
VCLT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VCLT against VPU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vclt-vs-vpu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.